News

The Provincial Court of Madrid, in response to the appeal filed by the selling shareholders of Euskaltel, ruled that the claims against International Cable (investment company of funds advised by Trilantic Europe and other co-investors) were based on an inadmissible interpretation of the earn-out clause in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement signed in 2012. Despite the judgment issued by the Court of First Instance having already dismissed their claims in their entirety, the claimants insisted on appealing the ruling, prolonging the litigation based on arguments that proved to be unfounded again in the second instance. The judgment that rejects all the claims has now become final, with the claimants also being ordered to cover all legal costs of the proceedings. The end of the legal proceedings demonstrates that International Cable fully complied with all the responsibilities acquired in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement, always acting in accordance with the law.

Firmly believing that the claims had no legal grounds, Trilantic Europe relentlessly defended over the years the interests of its investors, refusing to settle at unfair terms and fighting until the end to prove that no money should leave the investors’ pockets. 

The Provincial Court of Madrid, in response to the appeal filed by the selling shareholders of Euskaltel, ruled that the claims against International Cable (investment company of funds advised by Trilantic Europe and other co-investors) were based on an inadmissible interpretation of the earn-out clause in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement signed in 2012. Despite the judgment issued by the Court of First Instance having already dismissed their claims in their entirety, the claimants insisted on appealing the ruling, prolonging the litigation based on arguments that proved to be unfounded again in the second instance. The judgment that rejects all the claims has now become final, with the claimants also being ordered to cover all legal costs of the proceedings. The end of the legal proceedings demonstrates that International Cable fully complied with all the responsibilities acquired in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement, always acting in accordance with the law.

Firmly believing that the claims had no legal grounds, Trilantic Europe relentlessly defended over the years the interests of its investors, refusing to settle at unfair terms and fighting until the end to prove that no money should leave the investors’ pockets. 

The Provincial Court of Madrid, in response to the appeal filed by the selling shareholders of Euskaltel, ruled that the claims against International Cable (investment company of funds advised by Trilantic Europe and other co-investors) were based on an inadmissible interpretation of the earn-out clause in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement signed in 2012. Despite the judgment issued by the Court of First Instance having already dismissed their claims in their entirety, the claimants insisted on appealing the ruling, prolonging the litigation based on arguments that proved to be unfounded again in the second instance. The judgment that rejects all the claims has now become final, with the claimants also being ordered to cover all legal costs of the proceedings. The end of the legal proceedings demonstrates that International Cable fully complied with all the responsibilities acquired in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement, always acting in accordance with the law.

Firmly believing that the claims had no legal grounds, Trilantic Europe relentlessly defended over the years the interests of its investors, refusing to settle at unfair terms and fighting until the end to prove that no money should leave the investors’ pockets. 

The Provincial Court of Madrid, in response to the appeal filed by the selling shareholders of Euskaltel, ruled that the claims against International Cable (investment company of funds advised by Trilantic Europe and other co-investors) were based on an inadmissible interpretation of the earn-out clause in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement signed in 2012. Despite the judgment issued by the Court of First Instance having already dismissed their claims in their entirety, the claimants insisted on appealing the ruling, prolonging the litigation based on arguments that proved to be unfounded again in the second instance. The judgment that rejects all the claims has now become final, with the claimants also being ordered to cover all legal costs of the proceedings. The end of the legal proceedings demonstrates that International Cable fully complied with all the responsibilities acquired in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement, always acting in accordance with the law.

Firmly believing that the claims had no legal grounds, Trilantic Europe relentlessly defended over the years the interests of its investors, refusing to settle at unfair terms and fighting until the end to prove that no money should leave the investors’ pockets. 

The Provincial Court of Madrid, in response to the appeal filed by the selling shareholders of Euskaltel, ruled that the claims against International Cable (investment company of funds advised by Trilantic Europe and other co-investors) were based on an inadmissible interpretation of the earn-out clause in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement signed in 2012. Despite the judgment issued by the Court of First Instance having already dismissed their claims in their entirety, the claimants insisted on appealing the ruling, prolonging the litigation based on arguments that proved to be unfounded again in the second instance. The judgment that rejects all the claims has now become final, with the claimants also being ordered to cover all legal costs of the proceedings. The end of the legal proceedings demonstrates that International Cable fully complied with all the responsibilities acquired in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement, always acting in accordance with the law.

Firmly believing that the claims had no legal grounds, Trilantic Europe relentlessly defended over the years the interests of its investors, refusing to settle at unfair terms and fighting until the end to prove that no money should leave the investors’ pockets. 

The Provincial Court of Madrid, in response to the appeal filed by the selling shareholders of Euskaltel, ruled that the claims against International Cable (investment company of funds advised by Trilantic Europe and other co-investors) were based on an inadmissible interpretation of the earn-out clause in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement signed in 2012. Despite the judgment issued by the Court of First Instance having already dismissed their claims in their entirety, the claimants insisted on appealing the ruling, prolonging the litigation based on arguments that proved to be unfounded again in the second instance. The judgment that rejects all the claims has now become final, with the claimants also being ordered to cover all legal costs of the proceedings. The end of the legal proceedings demonstrates that International Cable fully complied with all the responsibilities acquired in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement, always acting in accordance with the law.

Firmly believing that the claims had no legal grounds, Trilantic Europe relentlessly defended over the years the interests of its investors, refusing to settle at unfair terms and fighting until the end to prove that no money should leave the investors’ pockets. 

The Provincial Court of Madrid, in response to the appeal filed by the selling shareholders of Euskaltel, ruled that the claims against International Cable (investment company of funds advised by Trilantic Europe and other co-investors) were based on an inadmissible interpretation of the earn-out clause in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement signed in 2012. Despite the judgment issued by the Court of First Instance having already dismissed their claims in their entirety, the claimants insisted on appealing the ruling, prolonging the litigation based on arguments that proved to be unfounded again in the second instance. The judgment that rejects all the claims has now become final, with the claimants also being ordered to cover all legal costs of the proceedings. The end of the legal proceedings demonstrates that International Cable fully complied with all the responsibilities acquired in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement, always acting in accordance with the law.

Firmly believing that the claims had no legal grounds, Trilantic Europe relentlessly defended over the years the interests of its investors, refusing to settle at unfair terms and fighting until the end to prove that no money should leave the investors’ pockets. 

The Provincial Court of Madrid, in response to the appeal filed by the selling shareholders of Euskaltel, ruled that the claims against International Cable (investment company of funds advised by Trilantic Europe and other co-investors) were based on an inadmissible interpretation of the earn-out clause in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement signed in 2012. Despite the judgment issued by the Court of First Instance having already dismissed their claims in their entirety, the claimants insisted on appealing the ruling, prolonging the litigation based on arguments that proved to be unfounded again in the second instance. The judgment that rejects all the claims has now become final, with the claimants also being ordered to cover all legal costs of the proceedings. The end of the legal proceedings demonstrates that International Cable fully complied with all the responsibilities acquired in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement, always acting in accordance with the law.

Firmly believing that the claims had no legal grounds, Trilantic Europe relentlessly defended over the years the interests of its investors, refusing to settle at unfair terms and fighting until the end to prove that no money should leave the investors’ pockets. 

The Provincial Court of Madrid, in response to the appeal filed by the selling shareholders of Euskaltel, ruled that the claims against International Cable (investment company of funds advised by Trilantic Europe and other co-investors) were based on an inadmissible interpretation of the earn-out clause in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement signed in 2012. Despite the judgment issued by the Court of First Instance having already dismissed their claims in their entirety, the claimants insisted on appealing the ruling, prolonging the litigation based on arguments that proved to be unfounded again in the second instance. The judgment that rejects all the claims has now become final, with the claimants also being ordered to cover all legal costs of the proceedings. The end of the legal proceedings demonstrates that International Cable fully complied with all the responsibilities acquired in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement, always acting in accordance with the law.

Firmly believing that the claims had no legal grounds, Trilantic Europe relentlessly defended over the years the interests of its investors, refusing to settle at unfair terms and fighting until the end to prove that no money should leave the investors’ pockets. 

The Provincial Court of Madrid, in response to the appeal filed by the selling shareholders of Euskaltel, ruled that the claims against International Cable (investment company of funds advised by Trilantic Europe and other co-investors) were based on an inadmissible interpretation of the earn-out clause in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement signed in 2012. Despite the judgment issued by the Court of First Instance having already dismissed their claims in their entirety, the claimants insisted on appealing the ruling, prolonging the litigation based on arguments that proved to be unfounded again in the second instance. The judgment that rejects all the claims has now become final, with the claimants also being ordered to cover all legal costs of the proceedings. The end of the legal proceedings demonstrates that International Cable fully complied with all the responsibilities acquired in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement, always acting in accordance with the law.

Firmly believing that the claims had no legal grounds, Trilantic Europe relentlessly defended over the years the interests of its investors, refusing to settle at unfair terms and fighting until the end to prove that no money should leave the investors’ pockets. 

The Provincial Court of Madrid, in response to the appeal filed by the selling shareholders of Euskaltel, ruled that the claims against International Cable (investment company of funds advised by Trilantic Europe and other co-investors) were based on an inadmissible interpretation of the earn-out clause in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement signed in 2012. Despite the judgment issued by the Court of First Instance having already dismissed their claims in their entirety, the claimants insisted on appealing the ruling, prolonging the litigation based on arguments that proved to be unfounded again in the second instance. The judgment that rejects all the claims has now become final, with the claimants also being ordered to cover all legal costs of the proceedings. The end of the legal proceedings demonstrates that International Cable fully complied with all the responsibilities acquired in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement, always acting in accordance with the law.

Firmly believing that the claims had no legal grounds, Trilantic Europe relentlessly defended over the years the interests of its investors, refusing to settle at unfair terms and fighting until the end to prove that no money should leave the investors’ pockets. 

The Provincial Court of Madrid, in response to the appeal filed by the selling shareholders of Euskaltel, ruled that the claims against International Cable (investment company of funds advised by Trilantic Europe and other co-investors) were based on an inadmissible interpretation of the earn-out clause in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement signed in 2012. Despite the judgment issued by the Court of First Instance having already dismissed their claims in their entirety, the claimants insisted on appealing the ruling, prolonging the litigation based on arguments that proved to be unfounded again in the second instance. The judgment that rejects all the claims has now become final, with the claimants also being ordered to cover all legal costs of the proceedings. The end of the legal proceedings demonstrates that International Cable fully complied with all the responsibilities acquired in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement, always acting in accordance with the law.

Firmly believing that the claims had no legal grounds, Trilantic Europe relentlessly defended over the years the interests of its investors, refusing to settle at unfair terms and fighting until the end to prove that no money should leave the investors’ pockets. 

The Provincial Court of Madrid, in response to the appeal filed by the selling shareholders of Euskaltel, ruled that the claims against International Cable (investment company of funds advised by Trilantic Europe and other co-investors) were based on an inadmissible interpretation of the earn-out clause in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement signed in 2012. Despite the judgment issued by the Court of First Instance having already dismissed their claims in their entirety, the claimants insisted on appealing the ruling, prolonging the litigation based on arguments that proved to be unfounded again in the second instance. The judgment that rejects all the claims has now become final, with the claimants also being ordered to cover all legal costs of the proceedings. The end of the legal proceedings demonstrates that International Cable fully complied with all the responsibilities acquired in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement, always acting in accordance with the law.

Firmly believing that the claims had no legal grounds, Trilantic Europe relentlessly defended over the years the interests of its investors, refusing to settle at unfair terms and fighting until the end to prove that no money should leave the investors’ pockets. 

The Provincial Court of Madrid, in response to the appeal filed by the selling shareholders of Euskaltel, ruled that the claims against International Cable (investment company of funds advised by Trilantic Europe and other co-investors) were based on an inadmissible interpretation of the earn-out clause in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement signed in 2012. Despite the judgment issued by the Court of First Instance having already dismissed their claims in their entirety, the claimants insisted on appealing the ruling, prolonging the litigation based on arguments that proved to be unfounded again in the second instance. The judgment that rejects all the claims has now become final, with the claimants also being ordered to cover all legal costs of the proceedings. The end of the legal proceedings demonstrates that International Cable fully complied with all the responsibilities acquired in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement, always acting in accordance with the law.

Firmly believing that the claims had no legal grounds, Trilantic Europe relentlessly defended over the years the interests of its investors, refusing to settle at unfair terms and fighting until the end to prove that no money should leave the investors’ pockets. 

The Provincial Court of Madrid, in response to the appeal filed by the selling shareholders of Euskaltel, ruled that the claims against International Cable (investment company of funds advised by Trilantic Europe and other co-investors) were based on an inadmissible interpretation of the earn-out clause in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement signed in 2012. Despite the judgment issued by the Court of First Instance having already dismissed their claims in their entirety, the claimants insisted on appealing the ruling, prolonging the litigation based on arguments that proved to be unfounded again in the second instance. The judgment that rejects all the claims has now become final, with the claimants also being ordered to cover all legal costs of the proceedings. The end of the legal proceedings demonstrates that International Cable fully complied with all the responsibilities acquired in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement, always acting in accordance with the law.

Firmly believing that the claims had no legal grounds, Trilantic Europe relentlessly defended over the years the interests of its investors, refusing to settle at unfair terms and fighting until the end to prove that no money should leave the investors’ pockets. 

The Provincial Court of Madrid, in response to the appeal filed by the selling shareholders of Euskaltel, ruled that the claims against International Cable (investment company of funds advised by Trilantic Europe and other co-investors) were based on an inadmissible interpretation of the earn-out clause in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement signed in 2012. Despite the judgment issued by the Court of First Instance having already dismissed their claims in their entirety, the claimants insisted on appealing the ruling, prolonging the litigation based on arguments that proved to be unfounded again in the second instance. The judgment that rejects all the claims has now become final, with the claimants also being ordered to cover all legal costs of the proceedings. The end of the legal proceedings demonstrates that International Cable fully complied with all the responsibilities acquired in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement, always acting in accordance with the law.

Firmly believing that the claims had no legal grounds, Trilantic Europe relentlessly defended over the years the interests of its investors, refusing to settle at unfair terms and fighting until the end to prove that no money should leave the investors’ pockets. 

The Provincial Court of Madrid, in response to the appeal filed by the selling shareholders of Euskaltel, ruled that the claims against International Cable (investment company of funds advised by Trilantic Europe and other co-investors) were based on an inadmissible interpretation of the earn-out clause in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement signed in 2012. Despite the judgment issued by the Court of First Instance having already dismissed their claims in their entirety, the claimants insisted on appealing the ruling, prolonging the litigation based on arguments that proved to be unfounded again in the second instance. The judgment that rejects all the claims has now become final, with the claimants also being ordered to cover all legal costs of the proceedings. The end of the legal proceedings demonstrates that International Cable fully complied with all the responsibilities acquired in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement, always acting in accordance with the law.

Firmly believing that the claims had no legal grounds, Trilantic Europe relentlessly defended over the years the interests of its investors, refusing to settle at unfair terms and fighting until the end to prove that no money should leave the investors’ pockets. 

The Provincial Court of Madrid, in response to the appeal filed by the selling shareholders of Euskaltel, ruled that the claims against International Cable (investment company of funds advised by Trilantic Europe and other co-investors) were based on an inadmissible interpretation of the earn-out clause in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement signed in 2012. Despite the judgment issued by the Court of First Instance having already dismissed their claims in their entirety, the claimants insisted on appealing the ruling, prolonging the litigation based on arguments that proved to be unfounded again in the second instance. The judgment that rejects all the claims has now become final, with the claimants also being ordered to cover all legal costs of the proceedings. The end of the legal proceedings demonstrates that International Cable fully complied with all the responsibilities acquired in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement, always acting in accordance with the law.

Firmly believing that the claims had no legal grounds, Trilantic Europe relentlessly defended over the years the interests of its investors, refusing to settle at unfair terms and fighting until the end to prove that no money should leave the investors’ pockets. 

The Provincial Court of Madrid, in response to the appeal filed by the selling shareholders of Euskaltel, ruled that the claims against International Cable (investment company of funds advised by Trilantic Europe and other co-investors) were based on an inadmissible interpretation of the earn-out clause in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement signed in 2012. Despite the judgment issued by the Court of First Instance having already dismissed their claims in their entirety, the claimants insisted on appealing the ruling, prolonging the litigation based on arguments that proved to be unfounded again in the second instance. The judgment that rejects all the claims has now become final, with the claimants also being ordered to cover all legal costs of the proceedings. The end of the legal proceedings demonstrates that International Cable fully complied with all the responsibilities acquired in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement, always acting in accordance with the law.

Firmly believing that the claims had no legal grounds, Trilantic Europe relentlessly defended over the years the interests of its investors, refusing to settle at unfair terms and fighting until the end to prove that no money should leave the investors’ pockets. 

The Provincial Court of Madrid, in response to the appeal filed by the selling shareholders of Euskaltel, ruled that the claims against International Cable (investment company of funds advised by Trilantic Europe and other co-investors) were based on an inadmissible interpretation of the earn-out clause in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement signed in 2012. Despite the judgment issued by the Court of First Instance having already dismissed their claims in their entirety, the claimants insisted on appealing the ruling, prolonging the litigation based on arguments that proved to be unfounded again in the second instance. The judgment that rejects all the claims has now become final, with the claimants also being ordered to cover all legal costs of the proceedings. The end of the legal proceedings demonstrates that International Cable fully complied with all the responsibilities acquired in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement, always acting in accordance with the law.

Firmly believing that the claims had no legal grounds, Trilantic Europe relentlessly defended over the years the interests of its investors, refusing to settle at unfair terms and fighting until the end to prove that no money should leave the investors’ pockets. 

The Provincial Court of Madrid, in response to the appeal filed by the selling shareholders of Euskaltel, ruled that the claims against International Cable (investment company of funds advised by Trilantic Europe and other co-investors) were based on an inadmissible interpretation of the earn-out clause in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement signed in 2012. Despite the judgment issued by the Court of First Instance having already dismissed their claims in their entirety, the claimants insisted on appealing the ruling, prolonging the litigation based on arguments that proved to be unfounded again in the second instance. The judgment that rejects all the claims has now become final, with the claimants also being ordered to cover all legal costs of the proceedings. The end of the legal proceedings demonstrates that International Cable fully complied with all the responsibilities acquired in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement, always acting in accordance with the law.

Firmly believing that the claims had no legal grounds, Trilantic Europe relentlessly defended over the years the interests of its investors, refusing to settle at unfair terms and fighting until the end to prove that no money should leave the investors’ pockets. 

The Provincial Court of Madrid, in response to the appeal filed by the selling shareholders of Euskaltel, ruled that the claims against International Cable (investment company of funds advised by Trilantic Europe and other co-investors) were based on an inadmissible interpretation of the earn-out clause in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement signed in 2012. Despite the judgment issued by the Court of First Instance having already dismissed their claims in their entirety, the claimants insisted on appealing the ruling, prolonging the litigation based on arguments that proved to be unfounded again in the second instance. The judgment that rejects all the claims has now become final, with the claimants also being ordered to cover all legal costs of the proceedings. The end of the legal proceedings demonstrates that International Cable fully complied with all the responsibilities acquired in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement, always acting in accordance with the law.

Firmly believing that the claims had no legal grounds, Trilantic Europe relentlessly defended over the years the interests of its investors, refusing to settle at unfair terms and fighting until the end to prove that no money should leave the investors’ pockets. 

The Provincial Court of Madrid, in response to the appeal filed by the selling shareholders of Euskaltel, ruled that the claims against International Cable (investment company of funds advised by Trilantic Europe and other co-investors) were based on an inadmissible interpretation of the earn-out clause in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement signed in 2012. Despite the judgment issued by the Court of First Instance having already dismissed their claims in their entirety, the claimants insisted on appealing the ruling, prolonging the litigation based on arguments that proved to be unfounded again in the second instance. The judgment that rejects all the claims has now become final, with the claimants also being ordered to cover all legal costs of the proceedings. The end of the legal proceedings demonstrates that International Cable fully complied with all the responsibilities acquired in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement, always acting in accordance with the law.

Firmly believing that the claims had no legal grounds, Trilantic Europe relentlessly defended over the years the interests of its investors, refusing to settle at unfair terms and fighting until the end to prove that no money should leave the investors’ pockets. 

The Provincial Court of Madrid, in response to the appeal filed by the selling shareholders of Euskaltel, ruled that the claims against International Cable (investment company of funds advised by Trilantic Europe and other co-investors) were based on an inadmissible interpretation of the earn-out clause in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement signed in 2012. Despite the judgment issued by the Court of First Instance having already dismissed their claims in their entirety, the claimants insisted on appealing the ruling, prolonging the litigation based on arguments that proved to be unfounded again in the second instance. The judgment that rejects all the claims has now become final, with the claimants also being ordered to cover all legal costs of the proceedings. The end of the legal proceedings demonstrates that International Cable fully complied with all the responsibilities acquired in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement, always acting in accordance with the law.

Firmly believing that the claims had no legal grounds, Trilantic Europe relentlessly defended over the years the interests of its investors, refusing to settle at unfair terms and fighting until the end to prove that no money should leave the investors’ pockets. 

The Provincial Court of Madrid, in response to the appeal filed by the selling shareholders of Euskaltel, ruled that the claims against International Cable (investment company of funds advised by Trilantic Europe and other co-investors) were based on an inadmissible interpretation of the earn-out clause in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement signed in 2012. Despite the judgment issued by the Court of First Instance having already dismissed their claims in their entirety, the claimants insisted on appealing the ruling, prolonging the litigation based on arguments that proved to be unfounded again in the second instance. The judgment that rejects all the claims has now become final, with the claimants also being ordered to cover all legal costs of the proceedings. The end of the legal proceedings demonstrates that International Cable fully complied with all the responsibilities acquired in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement, always acting in accordance with the law.

Firmly believing that the claims had no legal grounds, Trilantic Europe relentlessly defended over the years the interests of its investors, refusing to settle at unfair terms and fighting until the end to prove that no money should leave the investors’ pockets. 

The Provincial Court of Madrid, in response to the appeal filed by the selling shareholders of Euskaltel, ruled that the claims against International Cable (investment company of funds advised by Trilantic Europe and other co-investors) were based on an inadmissible interpretation of the earn-out clause in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement signed in 2012. Despite the judgment issued by the Court of First Instance having already dismissed their claims in their entirety, the claimants insisted on appealing the ruling, prolonging the litigation based on arguments that proved to be unfounded again in the second instance. The judgment that rejects all the claims has now become final, with the claimants also being ordered to cover all legal costs of the proceedings. The end of the legal proceedings demonstrates that International Cable fully complied with all the responsibilities acquired in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement, always acting in accordance with the law.

Firmly believing that the claims had no legal grounds, Trilantic Europe relentlessly defended over the years the interests of its investors, refusing to settle at unfair terms and fighting until the end to prove that no money should leave the investors’ pockets. 

The Provincial Court of Madrid, in response to the appeal filed by the selling shareholders of Euskaltel, ruled that the claims against International Cable (investment company of funds advised by Trilantic Europe and other co-investors) were based on an inadmissible interpretation of the earn-out clause in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement signed in 2012. Despite the judgment issued by the Court of First Instance having already dismissed their claims in their entirety, the claimants insisted on appealing the ruling, prolonging the litigation based on arguments that proved to be unfounded again in the second instance. The judgment that rejects all the claims has now become final, with the claimants also being ordered to cover all legal costs of the proceedings. The end of the legal proceedings demonstrates that International Cable fully complied with all the responsibilities acquired in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement, always acting in accordance with the law.

Firmly believing that the claims had no legal grounds, Trilantic Europe relentlessly defended over the years the interests of its investors, refusing to settle at unfair terms and fighting until the end to prove that no money should leave the investors’ pockets. 

The Provincial Court of Madrid, in response to the appeal filed by the selling shareholders of Euskaltel, ruled that the claims against International Cable (investment company of funds advised by Trilantic Europe and other co-investors) were based on an inadmissible interpretation of the earn-out clause in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement signed in 2012. Despite the judgment issued by the Court of First Instance having already dismissed their claims in their entirety, the claimants insisted on appealing the ruling, prolonging the litigation based on arguments that proved to be unfounded again in the second instance. The judgment that rejects all the claims has now become final, with the claimants also being ordered to cover all legal costs of the proceedings. The end of the legal proceedings demonstrates that International Cable fully complied with all the responsibilities acquired in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement, always acting in accordance with the law.

Firmly believing that the claims had no legal grounds, Trilantic Europe relentlessly defended over the years the interests of its investors, refusing to settle at unfair terms and fighting until the end to prove that no money should leave the investors’ pockets. 

The Provincial Court of Madrid, in response to the appeal filed by the selling shareholders of Euskaltel, ruled that the claims against International Cable (investment company of funds advised by Trilantic Europe and other co-investors) were based on an inadmissible interpretation of the earn-out clause in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement signed in 2012. Despite the judgment issued by the Court of First Instance having already dismissed their claims in their entirety, the claimants insisted on appealing the ruling, prolonging the litigation based on arguments that proved to be unfounded again in the second instance. The judgment that rejects all the claims has now become final, with the claimants also being ordered to cover all legal costs of the proceedings. The end of the legal proceedings demonstrates that International Cable fully complied with all the responsibilities acquired in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement, always acting in accordance with the law.

Firmly believing that the claims had no legal grounds, Trilantic Europe relentlessly defended over the years the interests of its investors, refusing to settle at unfair terms and fighting until the end to prove that no money should leave the investors’ pockets. 

The Provincial Court of Madrid, in response to the appeal filed by the selling shareholders of Euskaltel, ruled that the claims against International Cable (investment company of funds advised by Trilantic Europe and other co-investors) were based on an inadmissible interpretation of the earn-out clause in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement signed in 2012. Despite the judgment issued by the Court of First Instance having already dismissed their claims in their entirety, the claimants insisted on appealing the ruling, prolonging the litigation based on arguments that proved to be unfounded again in the second instance. The judgment that rejects all the claims has now become final, with the claimants also being ordered to cover all legal costs of the proceedings. The end of the legal proceedings demonstrates that International Cable fully complied with all the responsibilities acquired in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement, always acting in accordance with the law.

Firmly believing that the claims had no legal grounds, Trilantic Europe relentlessly defended over the years the interests of its investors, refusing to settle at unfair terms and fighting until the end to prove that no money should leave the investors’ pockets. 

The Provincial Court of Madrid, in response to the appeal filed by the selling shareholders of Euskaltel, ruled that the claims against International Cable (investment company of funds advised by Trilantic Europe and other co-investors) were based on an inadmissible interpretation of the earn-out clause in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement signed in 2012. Despite the judgment issued by the Court of First Instance having already dismissed their claims in their entirety, the claimants insisted on appealing the ruling, prolonging the litigation based on arguments that proved to be unfounded again in the second instance. The judgment that rejects all the claims has now become final, with the claimants also being ordered to cover all legal costs of the proceedings. The end of the legal proceedings demonstrates that International Cable fully complied with all the responsibilities acquired in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement, always acting in accordance with the law.

Firmly believing that the claims had no legal grounds, Trilantic Europe relentlessly defended over the years the interests of its investors, refusing to settle at unfair terms and fighting until the end to prove that no money should leave the investors’ pockets. 

The Provincial Court of Madrid, in response to the appeal filed by the selling shareholders of Euskaltel, ruled that the claims against International Cable (investment company of funds advised by Trilantic Europe and other co-investors) were based on an inadmissible interpretation of the earn-out clause in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement signed in 2012. Despite the judgment issued by the Court of First Instance having already dismissed their claims in their entirety, the claimants insisted on appealing the ruling, prolonging the litigation based on arguments that proved to be unfounded again in the second instance. The judgment that rejects all the claims has now become final, with the claimants also being ordered to cover all legal costs of the proceedings. The end of the legal proceedings demonstrates that International Cable fully complied with all the responsibilities acquired in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement, always acting in accordance with the law.

Firmly believing that the claims had no legal grounds, Trilantic Europe relentlessly defended over the years the interests of its investors, refusing to settle at unfair terms and fighting until the end to prove that no money should leave the investors’ pockets. 

The Provincial Court of Madrid, in response to the appeal filed by the selling shareholders of Euskaltel, ruled that the claims against International Cable (investment company of funds advised by Trilantic Europe and other co-investors) were based on an inadmissible interpretation of the earn-out clause in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement signed in 2012. Despite the judgment issued by the Court of First Instance having already dismissed their claims in their entirety, the claimants insisted on appealing the ruling, prolonging the litigation based on arguments that proved to be unfounded again in the second instance. The judgment that rejects all the claims has now become final, with the claimants also being ordered to cover all legal costs of the proceedings. The end of the legal proceedings demonstrates that International Cable fully complied with all the responsibilities acquired in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement, always acting in accordance with the law.

Firmly believing that the claims had no legal grounds, Trilantic Europe relentlessly defended over the years the interests of its investors, refusing to settle at unfair terms and fighting until the end to prove that no money should leave the investors’ pockets. 

The Provincial Court of Madrid, in response to the appeal filed by the selling shareholders of Euskaltel, ruled that the claims against International Cable (investment company of funds advised by Trilantic Europe and other co-investors) were based on an inadmissible interpretation of the earn-out clause in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement signed in 2012. Despite the judgment issued by the Court of First Instance having already dismissed their claims in their entirety, the claimants insisted on appealing the ruling, prolonging the litigation based on arguments that proved to be unfounded again in the second instance. The judgment that rejects all the claims has now become final, with the claimants also being ordered to cover all legal costs of the proceedings. The end of the legal proceedings demonstrates that International Cable fully complied with all the responsibilities acquired in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement, always acting in accordance with the law.

Firmly believing that the claims had no legal grounds, Trilantic Europe relentlessly defended over the years the interests of its investors, refusing to settle at unfair terms and fighting until the end to prove that no money should leave the investors’ pockets. 

The Provincial Court of Madrid, in response to the appeal filed by the selling shareholders of Euskaltel, ruled that the claims against International Cable (investment company of funds advised by Trilantic Europe and other co-investors) were based on an inadmissible interpretation of the earn-out clause in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement signed in 2012. Despite the judgment issued by the Court of First Instance having already dismissed their claims in their entirety, the claimants insisted on appealing the ruling, prolonging the litigation based on arguments that proved to be unfounded again in the second instance. The judgment that rejects all the claims has now become final, with the claimants also being ordered to cover all legal costs of the proceedings. The end of the legal proceedings demonstrates that International Cable fully complied with all the responsibilities acquired in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement, always acting in accordance with the law.

Firmly believing that the claims had no legal grounds, Trilantic Europe relentlessly defended over the years the interests of its investors, refusing to settle at unfair terms and fighting until the end to prove that no money should leave the investors’ pockets. 

The Provincial Court of Madrid, in response to the appeal filed by the selling shareholders of Euskaltel, ruled that the claims against International Cable (investment company of funds advised by Trilantic Europe and other co-investors) were based on an inadmissible interpretation of the earn-out clause in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement signed in 2012. Despite the judgment issued by the Court of First Instance having already dismissed their claims in their entirety, the claimants insisted on appealing the ruling, prolonging the litigation based on arguments that proved to be unfounded again in the second instance. The judgment that rejects all the claims has now become final, with the claimants also being ordered to cover all legal costs of the proceedings. The end of the legal proceedings demonstrates that International Cable fully complied with all the responsibilities acquired in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement, always acting in accordance with the law.

Firmly believing that the claims had no legal grounds, Trilantic Europe relentlessly defended over the years the interests of its investors, refusing to settle at unfair terms and fighting until the end to prove that no money should leave the investors’ pockets. 

The Provincial Court of Madrid, in response to the appeal filed by the selling shareholders of Euskaltel, ruled that the claims against International Cable (investment company of funds advised by Trilantic Europe and other co-investors) were based on an inadmissible interpretation of the earn-out clause in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement signed in 2012. Despite the judgment issued by the Court of First Instance having already dismissed their claims in their entirety, the claimants insisted on appealing the ruling, prolonging the litigation based on arguments that proved to be unfounded again in the second instance. The judgment that rejects all the claims has now become final, with the claimants also being ordered to cover all legal costs of the proceedings. The end of the legal proceedings demonstrates that International Cable fully complied with all the responsibilities acquired in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement, always acting in accordance with the law.

Firmly believing that the claims had no legal grounds, Trilantic Europe relentlessly defended over the years the interests of its investors, refusing to settle at unfair terms and fighting until the end to prove that no money should leave the investors’ pockets. 

The Provincial Court of Madrid, in response to the appeal filed by the selling shareholders of Euskaltel, ruled that the claims against International Cable (investment company of funds advised by Trilantic Europe and other co-investors) were based on an inadmissible interpretation of the earn-out clause in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement signed in 2012. Despite the judgment issued by the Court of First Instance having already dismissed their claims in their entirety, the claimants insisted on appealing the ruling, prolonging the litigation based on arguments that proved to be unfounded again in the second instance. The judgment that rejects all the claims has now become final, with the claimants also being ordered to cover all legal costs of the proceedings. The end of the legal proceedings demonstrates that International Cable fully complied with all the responsibilities acquired in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement, always acting in accordance with the law.

Firmly believing that the claims had no legal grounds, Trilantic Europe relentlessly defended over the years the interests of its investors, refusing to settle at unfair terms and fighting until the end to prove that no money should leave the investors’ pockets. 

The Provincial Court of Madrid, in response to the appeal filed by the selling shareholders of Euskaltel, ruled that the claims against International Cable (investment company of funds advised by Trilantic Europe and other co-investors) were based on an inadmissible interpretation of the earn-out clause in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement signed in 2012. Despite the judgment issued by the Court of First Instance having already dismissed their claims in their entirety, the claimants insisted on appealing the ruling, prolonging the litigation based on arguments that proved to be unfounded again in the second instance. The judgment that rejects all the claims has now become final, with the claimants also being ordered to cover all legal costs of the proceedings. The end of the legal proceedings demonstrates that International Cable fully complied with all the responsibilities acquired in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement, always acting in accordance with the law.

Firmly believing that the claims had no legal grounds, Trilantic Europe relentlessly defended over the years the interests of its investors, refusing to settle at unfair terms and fighting until the end to prove that no money should leave the investors’ pockets. 

The Provincial Court of Madrid, in response to the appeal filed by the selling shareholders of Euskaltel, ruled that the claims against International Cable (investment company of funds advised by Trilantic Europe and other co-investors) were based on an inadmissible interpretation of the earn-out clause in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement signed in 2012. Despite the judgment issued by the Court of First Instance having already dismissed their claims in their entirety, the claimants insisted on appealing the ruling, prolonging the litigation based on arguments that proved to be unfounded again in the second instance. The judgment that rejects all the claims has now become final, with the claimants also being ordered to cover all legal costs of the proceedings. The end of the legal proceedings demonstrates that International Cable fully complied with all the responsibilities acquired in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement, always acting in accordance with the law.

Firmly believing that the claims had no legal grounds, Trilantic Europe relentlessly defended over the years the interests of its investors, refusing to settle at unfair terms and fighting until the end to prove that no money should leave the investors’ pockets. 

The Provincial Court of Madrid, in response to the appeal filed by the selling shareholders of Euskaltel, ruled that the claims against International Cable (investment company of funds advised by Trilantic Europe and other co-investors) were based on an inadmissible interpretation of the earn-out clause in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement signed in 2012. Despite the judgment issued by the Court of First Instance having already dismissed their claims in their entirety, the claimants insisted on appealing the ruling, prolonging the litigation based on arguments that proved to be unfounded again in the second instance. The judgment that rejects all the claims has now become final, with the claimants also being ordered to cover all legal costs of the proceedings. The end of the legal proceedings demonstrates that International Cable fully complied with all the responsibilities acquired in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement, always acting in accordance with the law.

Firmly believing that the claims had no legal grounds, Trilantic Europe relentlessly defended over the years the interests of its investors, refusing to settle at unfair terms and fighting until the end to prove that no money should leave the investors’ pockets. 

The Provincial Court of Madrid, in response to the appeal filed by the selling shareholders of Euskaltel, ruled that the claims against International Cable (investment company of funds advised by Trilantic Europe and other co-investors) were based on an inadmissible interpretation of the earn-out clause in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement signed in 2012. Despite the judgment issued by the Court of First Instance having already dismissed their claims in their entirety, the claimants insisted on appealing the ruling, prolonging the litigation based on arguments that proved to be unfounded again in the second instance. The judgment that rejects all the claims has now become final, with the claimants also being ordered to cover all legal costs of the proceedings. The end of the legal proceedings demonstrates that International Cable fully complied with all the responsibilities acquired in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement, always acting in accordance with the law.

Firmly believing that the claims had no legal grounds, Trilantic Europe relentlessly defended over the years the interests of its investors, refusing to settle at unfair terms and fighting until the end to prove that no money should leave the investors’ pockets. 

The Provincial Court of Madrid, in response to the appeal filed by the selling shareholders of Euskaltel, ruled that the claims against International Cable (investment company of funds advised by Trilantic Europe and other co-investors) were based on an inadmissible interpretation of the earn-out clause in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement signed in 2012. Despite the judgment issued by the Court of First Instance having already dismissed their claims in their entirety, the claimants insisted on appealing the ruling, prolonging the litigation based on arguments that proved to be unfounded again in the second instance. The judgment that rejects all the claims has now become final, with the claimants also being ordered to cover all legal costs of the proceedings. The end of the legal proceedings demonstrates that International Cable fully complied with all the responsibilities acquired in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement, always acting in accordance with the law.

Firmly believing that the claims had no legal grounds, Trilantic Europe relentlessly defended over the years the interests of its investors, refusing to settle at unfair terms and fighting until the end to prove that no money should leave the investors’ pockets. 

The Provincial Court of Madrid, in response to the appeal filed by the selling shareholders of Euskaltel, ruled that the claims against International Cable (investment company of funds advised by Trilantic Europe and other co-investors) were based on an inadmissible interpretation of the earn-out clause in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement signed in 2012. Despite the judgment issued by the Court of First Instance having already dismissed their claims in their entirety, the claimants insisted on appealing the ruling, prolonging the litigation based on arguments that proved to be unfounded again in the second instance. The judgment that rejects all the claims has now become final, with the claimants also being ordered to cover all legal costs of the proceedings. The end of the legal proceedings demonstrates that International Cable fully complied with all the responsibilities acquired in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement, always acting in accordance with the law.

Firmly believing that the claims had no legal grounds, Trilantic Europe relentlessly defended over the years the interests of its investors, refusing to settle at unfair terms and fighting until the end to prove that no money should leave the investors’ pockets. 

The Provincial Court of Madrid, in response to the appeal filed by the selling shareholders of Euskaltel, ruled that the claims against International Cable (investment company of funds advised by Trilantic Europe and other co-investors) were based on an inadmissible interpretation of the earn-out clause in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement signed in 2012. Despite the judgment issued by the Court of First Instance having already dismissed their claims in their entirety, the claimants insisted on appealing the ruling, prolonging the litigation based on arguments that proved to be unfounded again in the second instance. The judgment that rejects all the claims has now become final, with the claimants also being ordered to cover all legal costs of the proceedings. The end of the legal proceedings demonstrates that International Cable fully complied with all the responsibilities acquired in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement, always acting in accordance with the law.

Firmly believing that the claims had no legal grounds, Trilantic Europe relentlessly defended over the years the interests of its investors, refusing to settle at unfair terms and fighting until the end to prove that no money should leave the investors’ pockets. 

The Provincial Court of Madrid, in response to the appeal filed by the selling shareholders of Euskaltel, ruled that the claims against International Cable (investment company of funds advised by Trilantic Europe and other co-investors) were based on an inadmissible interpretation of the earn-out clause in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement signed in 2012. Despite the judgment issued by the Court of First Instance having already dismissed their claims in their entirety, the claimants insisted on appealing the ruling, prolonging the litigation based on arguments that proved to be unfounded again in the second instance. The judgment that rejects all the claims has now become final, with the claimants also being ordered to cover all legal costs of the proceedings. The end of the legal proceedings demonstrates that International Cable fully complied with all the responsibilities acquired in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement, always acting in accordance with the law.

Firmly believing that the claims had no legal grounds, Trilantic Europe relentlessly defended over the years the interests of its investors, refusing to settle at unfair terms and fighting until the end to prove that no money should leave the investors’ pockets. 

The Provincial Court of Madrid, in response to the appeal filed by the selling shareholders of Euskaltel, ruled that the claims against International Cable (investment company of funds advised by Trilantic Europe and other co-investors) were based on an inadmissible interpretation of the earn-out clause in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement signed in 2012. Despite the judgment issued by the Court of First Instance having already dismissed their claims in their entirety, the claimants insisted on appealing the ruling, prolonging the litigation based on arguments that proved to be unfounded again in the second instance. The judgment that rejects all the claims has now become final, with the claimants also being ordered to cover all legal costs of the proceedings. The end of the legal proceedings demonstrates that International Cable fully complied with all the responsibilities acquired in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement, always acting in accordance with the law.

Firmly believing that the claims had no legal grounds, Trilantic Europe relentlessly defended over the years the interests of its investors, refusing to settle at unfair terms and fighting until the end to prove that no money should leave the investors’ pockets. 

The Provincial Court of Madrid, in response to the appeal filed by the selling shareholders of Euskaltel, ruled that the claims against International Cable (investment company of funds advised by Trilantic Europe and other co-investors) were based on an inadmissible interpretation of the earn-out clause in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement signed in 2012. Despite the judgment issued by the Court of First Instance having already dismissed their claims in their entirety, the claimants insisted on appealing the ruling, prolonging the litigation based on arguments that proved to be unfounded again in the second instance. The judgment that rejects all the claims has now become final, with the claimants also being ordered to cover all legal costs of the proceedings. The end of the legal proceedings demonstrates that International Cable fully complied with all the responsibilities acquired in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement, always acting in accordance with the law.

Firmly believing that the claims had no legal grounds, Trilantic Europe relentlessly defended over the years the interests of its investors, refusing to settle at unfair terms and fighting until the end to prove that no money should leave the investors’ pockets. 

The Provincial Court of Madrid, in response to the appeal filed by the selling shareholders of Euskaltel, ruled that the claims against International Cable (investment company of funds advised by Trilantic Europe and other co-investors) were based on an inadmissible interpretation of the earn-out clause in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement signed in 2012. Despite the judgment issued by the Court of First Instance having already dismissed their claims in their entirety, the claimants insisted on appealing the ruling, prolonging the litigation based on arguments that proved to be unfounded again in the second instance. The judgment that rejects all the claims has now become final, with the claimants also being ordered to cover all legal costs of the proceedings. The end of the legal proceedings demonstrates that International Cable fully complied with all the responsibilities acquired in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement, always acting in accordance with the law.

Firmly believing that the claims had no legal grounds, Trilantic Europe relentlessly defended over the years the interests of its investors, refusing to settle at unfair terms and fighting until the end to prove that no money should leave the investors’ pockets. 

The Provincial Court of Madrid, in response to the appeal filed by the selling shareholders of Euskaltel, ruled that the claims against International Cable (investment company of funds advised by Trilantic Europe and other co-investors) were based on an inadmissible interpretation of the earn-out clause in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement signed in 2012. Despite the judgment issued by the Court of First Instance having already dismissed their claims in their entirety, the claimants insisted on appealing the ruling, prolonging the litigation based on arguments that proved to be unfounded again in the second instance. The judgment that rejects all the claims has now become final, with the claimants also being ordered to cover all legal costs of the proceedings. The end of the legal proceedings demonstrates that International Cable fully complied with all the responsibilities acquired in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement, always acting in accordance with the law.

Firmly believing that the claims had no legal grounds, Trilantic Europe relentlessly defended over the years the interests of its investors, refusing to settle at unfair terms and fighting until the end to prove that no money should leave the investors’ pockets. 

The Provincial Court of Madrid, in response to the appeal filed by the selling shareholders of Euskaltel, ruled that the claims against International Cable (investment company of funds advised by Trilantic Europe and other co-investors) were based on an inadmissible interpretation of the earn-out clause in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement signed in 2012. Despite the judgment issued by the Court of First Instance having already dismissed their claims in their entirety, the claimants insisted on appealing the ruling, prolonging the litigation based on arguments that proved to be unfounded again in the second instance. The judgment that rejects all the claims has now become final, with the claimants also being ordered to cover all legal costs of the proceedings. The end of the legal proceedings demonstrates that International Cable fully complied with all the responsibilities acquired in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement, always acting in accordance with the law.

Firmly believing that the claims had no legal grounds, Trilantic Europe relentlessly defended over the years the interests of its investors, refusing to settle at unfair terms and fighting until the end to prove that no money should leave the investors’ pockets. 

The Provincial Court of Madrid, in response to the appeal filed by the selling shareholders of Euskaltel, ruled that the claims against International Cable (investment company of funds advised by Trilantic Europe and other co-investors) were based on an inadmissible interpretation of the earn-out clause in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement signed in 2012. Despite the judgment issued by the Court of First Instance having already dismissed their claims in their entirety, the claimants insisted on appealing the ruling, prolonging the litigation based on arguments that proved to be unfounded again in the second instance. The judgment that rejects all the claims has now become final, with the claimants also being ordered to cover all legal costs of the proceedings. The end of the legal proceedings demonstrates that International Cable fully complied with all the responsibilities acquired in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement, always acting in accordance with the law.

Firmly believing that the claims had no legal grounds, Trilantic Europe relentlessly defended over the years the interests of its investors, refusing to settle at unfair terms and fighting until the end to prove that no money should leave the investors’ pockets. 

The Provincial Court of Madrid, in response to the appeal filed by the selling shareholders of Euskaltel, ruled that the claims against International Cable (investment company of funds advised by Trilantic Europe and other co-investors) were based on an inadmissible interpretation of the earn-out clause in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement signed in 2012. Despite the judgment issued by the Court of First Instance having already dismissed their claims in their entirety, the claimants insisted on appealing the ruling, prolonging the litigation based on arguments that proved to be unfounded again in the second instance. The judgment that rejects all the claims has now become final, with the claimants also being ordered to cover all legal costs of the proceedings. The end of the legal proceedings demonstrates that International Cable fully complied with all the responsibilities acquired in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement, always acting in accordance with the law.

Firmly believing that the claims had no legal grounds, Trilantic Europe relentlessly defended over the years the interests of its investors, refusing to settle at unfair terms and fighting until the end to prove that no money should leave the investors’ pockets. 

The Provincial Court of Madrid, in response to the appeal filed by the selling shareholders of Euskaltel, ruled that the claims against International Cable (investment company of funds advised by Trilantic Europe and other co-investors) were based on an inadmissible interpretation of the earn-out clause in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement signed in 2012. Despite the judgment issued by the Court of First Instance having already dismissed their claims in their entirety, the claimants insisted on appealing the ruling, prolonging the litigation based on arguments that proved to be unfounded again in the second instance. The judgment that rejects all the claims has now become final, with the claimants also being ordered to cover all legal costs of the proceedings. The end of the legal proceedings demonstrates that International Cable fully complied with all the responsibilities acquired in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement, always acting in accordance with the law.

Firmly believing that the claims had no legal grounds, Trilantic Europe relentlessly defended over the years the interests of its investors, refusing to settle at unfair terms and fighting until the end to prove that no money should leave the investors’ pockets. 

The Provincial Court of Madrid, in response to the appeal filed by the selling shareholders of Euskaltel, ruled that the claims against International Cable (investment company of funds advised by Trilantic Europe and other co-investors) were based on an inadmissible interpretation of the earn-out clause in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement signed in 2012. Despite the judgment issued by the Court of First Instance having already dismissed their claims in their entirety, the claimants insisted on appealing the ruling, prolonging the litigation based on arguments that proved to be unfounded again in the second instance. The judgment that rejects all the claims has now become final, with the claimants also being ordered to cover all legal costs of the proceedings. The end of the legal proceedings demonstrates that International Cable fully complied with all the responsibilities acquired in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement, always acting in accordance with the law.

Firmly believing that the claims had no legal grounds, Trilantic Europe relentlessly defended over the years the interests of its investors, refusing to settle at unfair terms and fighting until the end to prove that no money should leave the investors’ pockets. 

The Provincial Court of Madrid, in response to the appeal filed by the selling shareholders of Euskaltel, ruled that the claims against International Cable (investment company of funds advised by Trilantic Europe and other co-investors) were based on an inadmissible interpretation of the earn-out clause in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement signed in 2012. Despite the judgment issued by the Court of First Instance having already dismissed their claims in their entirety, the claimants insisted on appealing the ruling, prolonging the litigation based on arguments that proved to be unfounded again in the second instance. The judgment that rejects all the claims has now become final, with the claimants also being ordered to cover all legal costs of the proceedings. The end of the legal proceedings demonstrates that International Cable fully complied with all the responsibilities acquired in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement, always acting in accordance with the law.

Firmly believing that the claims had no legal grounds, Trilantic Europe relentlessly defended over the years the interests of its investors, refusing to settle at unfair terms and fighting until the end to prove that no money should leave the investors’ pockets. 

The Provincial Court of Madrid, in response to the appeal filed by the selling shareholders of Euskaltel, ruled that the claims against International Cable (investment company of funds advised by Trilantic Europe and other co-investors) were based on an inadmissible interpretation of the earn-out clause in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement signed in 2012. Despite the judgment issued by the Court of First Instance having already dismissed their claims in their entirety, the claimants insisted on appealing the ruling, prolonging the litigation based on arguments that proved to be unfounded again in the second instance. The judgment that rejects all the claims has now become final, with the claimants also being ordered to cover all legal costs of the proceedings. The end of the legal proceedings demonstrates that International Cable fully complied with all the responsibilities acquired in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement, always acting in accordance with the law.

Firmly believing that the claims had no legal grounds, Trilantic Europe relentlessly defended over the years the interests of its investors, refusing to settle at unfair terms and fighting until the end to prove that no money should leave the investors’ pockets. 

The Provincial Court of Madrid, in response to the appeal filed by the selling shareholders of Euskaltel, ruled that the claims against International Cable (investment company of funds advised by Trilantic Europe and other co-investors) were based on an inadmissible interpretation of the earn-out clause in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement signed in 2012. Despite the judgment issued by the Court of First Instance having already dismissed their claims in their entirety, the claimants insisted on appealing the ruling, prolonging the litigation based on arguments that proved to be unfounded again in the second instance. The judgment that rejects all the claims has now become final, with the claimants also being ordered to cover all legal costs of the proceedings. The end of the legal proceedings demonstrates that International Cable fully complied with all the responsibilities acquired in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement, always acting in accordance with the law.

Firmly believing that the claims had no legal grounds, Trilantic Europe relentlessly defended over the years the interests of its investors, refusing to settle at unfair terms and fighting until the end to prove that no money should leave the investors’ pockets. 

The Provincial Court of Madrid, in response to the appeal filed by the selling shareholders of Euskaltel, ruled that the claims against International Cable (investment company of funds advised by Trilantic Europe and other co-investors) were based on an inadmissible interpretation of the earn-out clause in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement signed in 2012. Despite the judgment issued by the Court of First Instance having already dismissed their claims in their entirety, the claimants insisted on appealing the ruling, prolonging the litigation based on arguments that proved to be unfounded again in the second instance. The judgment that rejects all the claims has now become final, with the claimants also being ordered to cover all legal costs of the proceedings. The end of the legal proceedings demonstrates that International Cable fully complied with all the responsibilities acquired in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement, always acting in accordance with the law.

Firmly believing that the claims had no legal grounds, Trilantic Europe relentlessly defended over the years the interests of its investors, refusing to settle at unfair terms and fighting until the end to prove that no money should leave the investors’ pockets. 

The Provincial Court of Madrid, in response to the appeal filed by the selling shareholders of Euskaltel, ruled that the claims against International Cable (investment company of funds advised by Trilantic Europe and other co-investors) were based on an inadmissible interpretation of the earn-out clause in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement signed in 2012. Despite the judgment issued by the Court of First Instance having already dismissed their claims in their entirety, the claimants insisted on appealing the ruling, prolonging the litigation based on arguments that proved to be unfounded again in the second instance. The judgment that rejects all the claims has now become final, with the claimants also being ordered to cover all legal costs of the proceedings. The end of the legal proceedings demonstrates that International Cable fully complied with all the responsibilities acquired in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement, always acting in accordance with the law.

Firmly believing that the claims had no legal grounds, Trilantic Europe relentlessly defended over the years the interests of its investors, refusing to settle at unfair terms and fighting until the end to prove that no money should leave the investors’ pockets. 

The Provincial Court of Madrid, in response to the appeal filed by the selling shareholders of Euskaltel, ruled that the claims against International Cable (investment company of funds advised by Trilantic Europe and other co-investors) were based on an inadmissible interpretation of the earn-out clause in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement signed in 2012. Despite the judgment issued by the Court of First Instance having already dismissed their claims in their entirety, the claimants insisted on appealing the ruling, prolonging the litigation based on arguments that proved to be unfounded again in the second instance. The judgment that rejects all the claims has now become final, with the claimants also being ordered to cover all legal costs of the proceedings. The end of the legal proceedings demonstrates that International Cable fully complied with all the responsibilities acquired in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement, always acting in accordance with the law.

Firmly believing that the claims had no legal grounds, Trilantic Europe relentlessly defended over the years the interests of its investors, refusing to settle at unfair terms and fighting until the end to prove that no money should leave the investors’ pockets. 

The Provincial Court of Madrid, in response to the appeal filed by the selling shareholders of Euskaltel, ruled that the claims against International Cable (investment company of funds advised by Trilantic Europe and other co-investors) were based on an inadmissible interpretation of the earn-out clause in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement signed in 2012. Despite the judgment issued by the Court of First Instance having already dismissed their claims in their entirety, the claimants insisted on appealing the ruling, prolonging the litigation based on arguments that proved to be unfounded again in the second instance. The judgment that rejects all the claims has now become final, with the claimants also being ordered to cover all legal costs of the proceedings. The end of the legal proceedings demonstrates that International Cable fully complied with all the responsibilities acquired in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement, always acting in accordance with the law.

Firmly believing that the claims had no legal grounds, Trilantic Europe relentlessly defended over the years the interests of its investors, refusing to settle at unfair terms and fighting until the end to prove that no money should leave the investors’ pockets. 

The Provincial Court of Madrid, in response to the appeal filed by the selling shareholders of Euskaltel, ruled that the claims against International Cable (investment company of funds advised by Trilantic Europe and other co-investors) were based on an inadmissible interpretation of the earn-out clause in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement signed in 2012. Despite the judgment issued by the Court of First Instance having already dismissed their claims in their entirety, the claimants insisted on appealing the ruling, prolonging the litigation based on arguments that proved to be unfounded again in the second instance. The judgment that rejects all the claims has now become final, with the claimants also being ordered to cover all legal costs of the proceedings. The end of the legal proceedings demonstrates that International Cable fully complied with all the responsibilities acquired in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement, always acting in accordance with the law.

Firmly believing that the claims had no legal grounds, Trilantic Europe relentlessly defended over the years the interests of its investors, refusing to settle at unfair terms and fighting until the end to prove that no money should leave the investors’ pockets.