navigation navigation
navigation

News

21 Sep 2022

toggle

YMU expands into gaming and sports marketing as digital sports MGMT joins the group

The Provincial Court of Madrid, in response to the appeal filed by the selling shareholders of Euskaltel, ruled that the claims against International Cable (investment company of funds advised by Trilantic Europe and other co-investors) were based on an inadmissible interpretation of the earn-out clause in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement signed in 2012. Despite the judgment issued by the Court of First Instance having already dismissed their claims in their entirety, the claimants insisted on appealing the ruling, prolonging the litigation based on arguments that proved to be unfounded again in the second instance. The judgment that rejects all the claims has now become final, with the claimants also being ordered to cover all legal costs of the proceedings. The end of the legal proceedings demonstrates that International Cable fully complied with all the responsibilities acquired in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement, always acting in accordance with the law.

Firmly believing that the claims had no legal grounds, Trilantic Europe relentlessly defended over the years the interests of its investors, refusing to settle at unfair terms and fighting until the end to prove that no money should leave the investors’ pockets. 

1 Aug 2022

toggle

Marex to acquire ED&F Man Capital Markets

The Provincial Court of Madrid, in response to the appeal filed by the selling shareholders of Euskaltel, ruled that the claims against International Cable (investment company of funds advised by Trilantic Europe and other co-investors) were based on an inadmissible interpretation of the earn-out clause in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement signed in 2012. Despite the judgment issued by the Court of First Instance having already dismissed their claims in their entirety, the claimants insisted on appealing the ruling, prolonging the litigation based on arguments that proved to be unfounded again in the second instance. The judgment that rejects all the claims has now become final, with the claimants also being ordered to cover all legal costs of the proceedings. The end of the legal proceedings demonstrates that International Cable fully complied with all the responsibilities acquired in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement, always acting in accordance with the law.

Firmly believing that the claims had no legal grounds, Trilantic Europe relentlessly defended over the years the interests of its investors, refusing to settle at unfair terms and fighting until the end to prove that no money should leave the investors’ pockets. 

25 Jul 2022

toggle

Trilantic Europe invests in Passione Unghie to accelerate the company’s growth strategy

The Provincial Court of Madrid, in response to the appeal filed by the selling shareholders of Euskaltel, ruled that the claims against International Cable (investment company of funds advised by Trilantic Europe and other co-investors) were based on an inadmissible interpretation of the earn-out clause in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement signed in 2012. Despite the judgment issued by the Court of First Instance having already dismissed their claims in their entirety, the claimants insisted on appealing the ruling, prolonging the litigation based on arguments that proved to be unfounded again in the second instance. The judgment that rejects all the claims has now become final, with the claimants also being ordered to cover all legal costs of the proceedings. The end of the legal proceedings demonstrates that International Cable fully complied with all the responsibilities acquired in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement, always acting in accordance with the law.

Firmly believing that the claims had no legal grounds, Trilantic Europe relentlessly defended over the years the interests of its investors, refusing to settle at unfair terms and fighting until the end to prove that no money should leave the investors’ pockets. 

10 May 2022

toggle

Kantar announces agreement for sale of Kantar Public business to Trilantic Europe

The Provincial Court of Madrid, in response to the appeal filed by the selling shareholders of Euskaltel, ruled that the claims against International Cable (investment company of funds advised by Trilantic Europe and other co-investors) were based on an inadmissible interpretation of the earn-out clause in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement signed in 2012. Despite the judgment issued by the Court of First Instance having already dismissed their claims in their entirety, the claimants insisted on appealing the ruling, prolonging the litigation based on arguments that proved to be unfounded again in the second instance. The judgment that rejects all the claims has now become final, with the claimants also being ordered to cover all legal costs of the proceedings. The end of the legal proceedings demonstrates that International Cable fully complied with all the responsibilities acquired in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement, always acting in accordance with the law.

Firmly believing that the claims had no legal grounds, Trilantic Europe relentlessly defended over the years the interests of its investors, refusing to settle at unfair terms and fighting until the end to prove that no money should leave the investors’ pockets. 

26 Apr 2022

toggle

Trilantic Europe-backed Alete Bikes acquires Cicli Esperia

The Provincial Court of Madrid, in response to the appeal filed by the selling shareholders of Euskaltel, ruled that the claims against International Cable (investment company of funds advised by Trilantic Europe and other co-investors) were based on an inadmissible interpretation of the earn-out clause in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement signed in 2012. Despite the judgment issued by the Court of First Instance having already dismissed their claims in their entirety, the claimants insisted on appealing the ruling, prolonging the litigation based on arguments that proved to be unfounded again in the second instance. The judgment that rejects all the claims has now become final, with the claimants also being ordered to cover all legal costs of the proceedings. The end of the legal proceedings demonstrates that International Cable fully complied with all the responsibilities acquired in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement, always acting in accordance with the law.

Firmly believing that the claims had no legal grounds, Trilantic Europe relentlessly defended over the years the interests of its investors, refusing to settle at unfair terms and fighting until the end to prove that no money should leave the investors’ pockets. 

20 Apr 2022

toggle

Commodity broker Marex reported record 2021 results in volatile markets

The Provincial Court of Madrid, in response to the appeal filed by the selling shareholders of Euskaltel, ruled that the claims against International Cable (investment company of funds advised by Trilantic Europe and other co-investors) were based on an inadmissible interpretation of the earn-out clause in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement signed in 2012. Despite the judgment issued by the Court of First Instance having already dismissed their claims in their entirety, the claimants insisted on appealing the ruling, prolonging the litigation based on arguments that proved to be unfounded again in the second instance. The judgment that rejects all the claims has now become final, with the claimants also being ordered to cover all legal costs of the proceedings. The end of the legal proceedings demonstrates that International Cable fully complied with all the responsibilities acquired in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement, always acting in accordance with the law.

Firmly believing that the claims had no legal grounds, Trilantic Europe relentlessly defended over the years the interests of its investors, refusing to settle at unfair terms and fighting until the end to prove that no money should leave the investors’ pockets. 

7 Feb 2022

toggle

Trilantic Europe’s International Cable wins Euskaltel litigation

The Provincial Court of Madrid, in response to the appeal filed by the selling shareholders of Euskaltel, ruled that the claims against International Cable (investment company of funds advised by Trilantic Europe and other co-investors) were based on an inadmissible interpretation of the earn-out clause in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement signed in 2012. Despite the judgment issued by the Court of First Instance having already dismissed their claims in their entirety, the claimants insisted on appealing the ruling, prolonging the litigation based on arguments that proved to be unfounded again in the second instance. The judgment that rejects all the claims has now become final, with the claimants also being ordered to cover all legal costs of the proceedings. The end of the legal proceedings demonstrates that International Cable fully complied with all the responsibilities acquired in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement, always acting in accordance with the law.

Firmly believing that the claims had no legal grounds, Trilantic Europe relentlessly defended over the years the interests of its investors, refusing to settle at unfair terms and fighting until the end to prove that no money should leave the investors’ pockets. 

3 Feb 2022

toggle

Talgo is finalising the development of its hydrogen train Talgo Vittal-One

The Provincial Court of Madrid, in response to the appeal filed by the selling shareholders of Euskaltel, ruled that the claims against International Cable (investment company of funds advised by Trilantic Europe and other co-investors) were based on an inadmissible interpretation of the earn-out clause in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement signed in 2012. Despite the judgment issued by the Court of First Instance having already dismissed their claims in their entirety, the claimants insisted on appealing the ruling, prolonging the litigation based on arguments that proved to be unfounded again in the second instance. The judgment that rejects all the claims has now become final, with the claimants also being ordered to cover all legal costs of the proceedings. The end of the legal proceedings demonstrates that International Cable fully complied with all the responsibilities acquired in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement, always acting in accordance with the law.

Firmly believing that the claims had no legal grounds, Trilantic Europe relentlessly defended over the years the interests of its investors, refusing to settle at unfair terms and fighting until the end to prove that no money should leave the investors’ pockets. 

1 Dec 2021

toggle

Trilantic Europe invests in Grupo Gransolar

The Provincial Court of Madrid, in response to the appeal filed by the selling shareholders of Euskaltel, ruled that the claims against International Cable (investment company of funds advised by Trilantic Europe and other co-investors) were based on an inadmissible interpretation of the earn-out clause in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement signed in 2012. Despite the judgment issued by the Court of First Instance having already dismissed their claims in their entirety, the claimants insisted on appealing the ruling, prolonging the litigation based on arguments that proved to be unfounded again in the second instance. The judgment that rejects all the claims has now become final, with the claimants also being ordered to cover all legal costs of the proceedings. The end of the legal proceedings demonstrates that International Cable fully complied with all the responsibilities acquired in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement, always acting in accordance with the law.

Firmly believing that the claims had no legal grounds, Trilantic Europe relentlessly defended over the years the interests of its investors, refusing to settle at unfair terms and fighting until the end to prove that no money should leave the investors’ pockets. 

22 Nov 2021

toggle

Trilantic Europe invests in Denver Bikes

The Provincial Court of Madrid, in response to the appeal filed by the selling shareholders of Euskaltel, ruled that the claims against International Cable (investment company of funds advised by Trilantic Europe and other co-investors) were based on an inadmissible interpretation of the earn-out clause in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement signed in 2012. Despite the judgment issued by the Court of First Instance having already dismissed their claims in their entirety, the claimants insisted on appealing the ruling, prolonging the litigation based on arguments that proved to be unfounded again in the second instance. The judgment that rejects all the claims has now become final, with the claimants also being ordered to cover all legal costs of the proceedings. The end of the legal proceedings demonstrates that International Cable fully complied with all the responsibilities acquired in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement, always acting in accordance with the law.

Firmly believing that the claims had no legal grounds, Trilantic Europe relentlessly defended over the years the interests of its investors, refusing to settle at unfair terms and fighting until the end to prove that no money should leave the investors’ pockets. 

26 Jul 2021

toggle

Trilantic Europe invests in Smile Eyes Group

The Provincial Court of Madrid, in response to the appeal filed by the selling shareholders of Euskaltel, ruled that the claims against International Cable (investment company of funds advised by Trilantic Europe and other co-investors) were based on an inadmissible interpretation of the earn-out clause in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement signed in 2012. Despite the judgment issued by the Court of First Instance having already dismissed their claims in their entirety, the claimants insisted on appealing the ruling, prolonging the litigation based on arguments that proved to be unfounded again in the second instance. The judgment that rejects all the claims has now become final, with the claimants also being ordered to cover all legal costs of the proceedings. The end of the legal proceedings demonstrates that International Cable fully complied with all the responsibilities acquired in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement, always acting in accordance with the law.

Firmly believing that the claims had no legal grounds, Trilantic Europe relentlessly defended over the years the interests of its investors, refusing to settle at unfair terms and fighting until the end to prove that no money should leave the investors’ pockets. 

19 Jul 2021

toggle

Repsol and Talgo to jointly develop a renewable hydrogen-powered train

The Provincial Court of Madrid, in response to the appeal filed by the selling shareholders of Euskaltel, ruled that the claims against International Cable (investment company of funds advised by Trilantic Europe and other co-investors) were based on an inadmissible interpretation of the earn-out clause in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement signed in 2012. Despite the judgment issued by the Court of First Instance having already dismissed their claims in their entirety, the claimants insisted on appealing the ruling, prolonging the litigation based on arguments that proved to be unfounded again in the second instance. The judgment that rejects all the claims has now become final, with the claimants also being ordered to cover all legal costs of the proceedings. The end of the legal proceedings demonstrates that International Cable fully complied with all the responsibilities acquired in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement, always acting in accordance with the law.

Firmly believing that the claims had no legal grounds, Trilantic Europe relentlessly defended over the years the interests of its investors, refusing to settle at unfair terms and fighting until the end to prove that no money should leave the investors’ pockets. 

23 Jun 2020

toggle

Trilantic Europe supports add-on acquisitions to bolster its healthcare portfolio in Italy and Germany

The Provincial Court of Madrid, in response to the appeal filed by the selling shareholders of Euskaltel, ruled that the claims against International Cable (investment company of funds advised by Trilantic Europe and other co-investors) were based on an inadmissible interpretation of the earn-out clause in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement signed in 2012. Despite the judgment issued by the Court of First Instance having already dismissed their claims in their entirety, the claimants insisted on appealing the ruling, prolonging the litigation based on arguments that proved to be unfounded again in the second instance. The judgment that rejects all the claims has now become final, with the claimants also being ordered to cover all legal costs of the proceedings. The end of the legal proceedings demonstrates that International Cable fully complied with all the responsibilities acquired in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement, always acting in accordance with the law.

Firmly believing that the claims had no legal grounds, Trilantic Europe relentlessly defended over the years the interests of its investors, refusing to settle at unfair terms and fighting until the end to prove that no money should leave the investors’ pockets. 

9 Apr 2020

toggle

Trilantic Europe portfolio companies are actively providing resources and know-how as well as making in-kind philanthropic contributions to support health authorities in their fight against COVID-19

The Provincial Court of Madrid, in response to the appeal filed by the selling shareholders of Euskaltel, ruled that the claims against International Cable (investment company of funds advised by Trilantic Europe and other co-investors) were based on an inadmissible interpretation of the earn-out clause in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement signed in 2012. Despite the judgment issued by the Court of First Instance having already dismissed their claims in their entirety, the claimants insisted on appealing the ruling, prolonging the litigation based on arguments that proved to be unfounded again in the second instance. The judgment that rejects all the claims has now become final, with the claimants also being ordered to cover all legal costs of the proceedings. The end of the legal proceedings demonstrates that International Cable fully complied with all the responsibilities acquired in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement, always acting in accordance with the law.

Firmly believing that the claims had no legal grounds, Trilantic Europe relentlessly defended over the years the interests of its investors, refusing to settle at unfair terms and fighting until the end to prove that no money should leave the investors’ pockets. 

23 Oct 2019

toggle

Trilantic Europe fully exits its successful investment in Gamenet

The Provincial Court of Madrid, in response to the appeal filed by the selling shareholders of Euskaltel, ruled that the claims against International Cable (investment company of funds advised by Trilantic Europe and other co-investors) were based on an inadmissible interpretation of the earn-out clause in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement signed in 2012. Despite the judgment issued by the Court of First Instance having already dismissed their claims in their entirety, the claimants insisted on appealing the ruling, prolonging the litigation based on arguments that proved to be unfounded again in the second instance. The judgment that rejects all the claims has now become final, with the claimants also being ordered to cover all legal costs of the proceedings. The end of the legal proceedings demonstrates that International Cable fully complied with all the responsibilities acquired in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement, always acting in accordance with the law.

Firmly believing that the claims had no legal grounds, Trilantic Europe relentlessly defended over the years the interests of its investors, refusing to settle at unfair terms and fighting until the end to prove that no money should leave the investors’ pockets. 

4 Sep 2019

toggle

Trilantic Europe supports two bolt-on acquisitions for Oberberg

The Provincial Court of Madrid, in response to the appeal filed by the selling shareholders of Euskaltel, ruled that the claims against International Cable (investment company of funds advised by Trilantic Europe and other co-investors) were based on an inadmissible interpretation of the earn-out clause in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement signed in 2012. Despite the judgment issued by the Court of First Instance having already dismissed their claims in their entirety, the claimants insisted on appealing the ruling, prolonging the litigation based on arguments that proved to be unfounded again in the second instance. The judgment that rejects all the claims has now become final, with the claimants also being ordered to cover all legal costs of the proceedings. The end of the legal proceedings demonstrates that International Cable fully complied with all the responsibilities acquired in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement, always acting in accordance with the law.

Firmly believing that the claims had no legal grounds, Trilantic Europe relentlessly defended over the years the interests of its investors, refusing to settle at unfair terms and fighting until the end to prove that no money should leave the investors’ pockets. 

30 Jul 2019

toggle

Trilantic Europe partially monetises its investment in Gamenet

The Provincial Court of Madrid, in response to the appeal filed by the selling shareholders of Euskaltel, ruled that the claims against International Cable (investment company of funds advised by Trilantic Europe and other co-investors) were based on an inadmissible interpretation of the earn-out clause in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement signed in 2012. Despite the judgment issued by the Court of First Instance having already dismissed their claims in their entirety, the claimants insisted on appealing the ruling, prolonging the litigation based on arguments that proved to be unfounded again in the second instance. The judgment that rejects all the claims has now become final, with the claimants also being ordered to cover all legal costs of the proceedings. The end of the legal proceedings demonstrates that International Cable fully complied with all the responsibilities acquired in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement, always acting in accordance with the law.

Firmly believing that the claims had no legal grounds, Trilantic Europe relentlessly defended over the years the interests of its investors, refusing to settle at unfair terms and fighting until the end to prove that no money should leave the investors’ pockets. 

21 Nov 2018

toggle

Talgo awarded 2018 Internationalization Award

The Provincial Court of Madrid, in response to the appeal filed by the selling shareholders of Euskaltel, ruled that the claims against International Cable (investment company of funds advised by Trilantic Europe and other co-investors) were based on an inadmissible interpretation of the earn-out clause in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement signed in 2012. Despite the judgment issued by the Court of First Instance having already dismissed their claims in their entirety, the claimants insisted on appealing the ruling, prolonging the litigation based on arguments that proved to be unfounded again in the second instance. The judgment that rejects all the claims has now become final, with the claimants also being ordered to cover all legal costs of the proceedings. The end of the legal proceedings demonstrates that International Cable fully complied with all the responsibilities acquired in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement, always acting in accordance with the law.

Firmly believing that the claims had no legal grounds, Trilantic Europe relentlessly defended over the years the interests of its investors, refusing to settle at unfair terms and fighting until the end to prove that no money should leave the investors’ pockets. 

28 Sep 2018

toggle

YM&U joins forces with Trilantic Europe following rebrand

The Provincial Court of Madrid, in response to the appeal filed by the selling shareholders of Euskaltel, ruled that the claims against International Cable (investment company of funds advised by Trilantic Europe and other co-investors) were based on an inadmissible interpretation of the earn-out clause in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement signed in 2012. Despite the judgment issued by the Court of First Instance having already dismissed their claims in their entirety, the claimants insisted on appealing the ruling, prolonging the litigation based on arguments that proved to be unfounded again in the second instance. The judgment that rejects all the claims has now become final, with the claimants also being ordered to cover all legal costs of the proceedings. The end of the legal proceedings demonstrates that International Cable fully complied with all the responsibilities acquired in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement, always acting in accordance with the law.

Firmly believing that the claims had no legal grounds, Trilantic Europe relentlessly defended over the years the interests of its investors, refusing to settle at unfair terms and fighting until the end to prove that no money should leave the investors’ pockets. 

24 Jul 2018

toggle

Gamenet Group signed the agreement for the acquisition of 100% of GoldBet

The Provincial Court of Madrid, in response to the appeal filed by the selling shareholders of Euskaltel, ruled that the claims against International Cable (investment company of funds advised by Trilantic Europe and other co-investors) were based on an inadmissible interpretation of the earn-out clause in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement signed in 2012. Despite the judgment issued by the Court of First Instance having already dismissed their claims in their entirety, the claimants insisted on appealing the ruling, prolonging the litigation based on arguments that proved to be unfounded again in the second instance. The judgment that rejects all the claims has now become final, with the claimants also being ordered to cover all legal costs of the proceedings. The end of the legal proceedings demonstrates that International Cable fully complied with all the responsibilities acquired in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement, always acting in accordance with the law.

Firmly believing that the claims had no legal grounds, Trilantic Europe relentlessly defended over the years the interests of its investors, refusing to settle at unfair terms and fighting until the end to prove that no money should leave the investors’ pockets. 

15 Dec 2017

toggle

Trilantic Europe invests in the Oberberg Group

The Provincial Court of Madrid, in response to the appeal filed by the selling shareholders of Euskaltel, ruled that the claims against International Cable (investment company of funds advised by Trilantic Europe and other co-investors) were based on an inadmissible interpretation of the earn-out clause in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement signed in 2012. Despite the judgment issued by the Court of First Instance having already dismissed their claims in their entirety, the claimants insisted on appealing the ruling, prolonging the litigation based on arguments that proved to be unfounded again in the second instance. The judgment that rejects all the claims has now become final, with the claimants also being ordered to cover all legal costs of the proceedings. The end of the legal proceedings demonstrates that International Cable fully complied with all the responsibilities acquired in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement, always acting in accordance with the law.

Firmly believing that the claims had no legal grounds, Trilantic Europe relentlessly defended over the years the interests of its investors, refusing to settle at unfair terms and fighting until the end to prove that no money should leave the investors’ pockets. 

6 Dec 2017

toggle

Gamenet Group completed the listing on Borsa Italiana

The Provincial Court of Madrid, in response to the appeal filed by the selling shareholders of Euskaltel, ruled that the claims against International Cable (investment company of funds advised by Trilantic Europe and other co-investors) were based on an inadmissible interpretation of the earn-out clause in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement signed in 2012. Despite the judgment issued by the Court of First Instance having already dismissed their claims in their entirety, the claimants insisted on appealing the ruling, prolonging the litigation based on arguments that proved to be unfounded again in the second instance. The judgment that rejects all the claims has now become final, with the claimants also being ordered to cover all legal costs of the proceedings. The end of the legal proceedings demonstrates that International Cable fully complied with all the responsibilities acquired in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement, always acting in accordance with the law.

Firmly believing that the claims had no legal grounds, Trilantic Europe relentlessly defended over the years the interests of its investors, refusing to settle at unfair terms and fighting until the end to prove that no money should leave the investors’ pockets. 

4 Dec 2017

toggle

Elisabetta Franchi purchases 25% of Betty Blue S.p.A. from Trilantic Europe

The Provincial Court of Madrid, in response to the appeal filed by the selling shareholders of Euskaltel, ruled that the claims against International Cable (investment company of funds advised by Trilantic Europe and other co-investors) were based on an inadmissible interpretation of the earn-out clause in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement signed in 2012. Despite the judgment issued by the Court of First Instance having already dismissed their claims in their entirety, the claimants insisted on appealing the ruling, prolonging the litigation based on arguments that proved to be unfounded again in the second instance. The judgment that rejects all the claims has now become final, with the claimants also being ordered to cover all legal costs of the proceedings. The end of the legal proceedings demonstrates that International Cable fully complied with all the responsibilities acquired in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement, always acting in accordance with the law.

Firmly believing that the claims had no legal grounds, Trilantic Europe relentlessly defended over the years the interests of its investors, refusing to settle at unfair terms and fighting until the end to prove that no money should leave the investors’ pockets. 

2 Nov 2017

toggle

Talgo shortlisted for HS2 rolling stock procurement

The Provincial Court of Madrid, in response to the appeal filed by the selling shareholders of Euskaltel, ruled that the claims against International Cable (investment company of funds advised by Trilantic Europe and other co-investors) were based on an inadmissible interpretation of the earn-out clause in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement signed in 2012. Despite the judgment issued by the Court of First Instance having already dismissed their claims in their entirety, the claimants insisted on appealing the ruling, prolonging the litigation based on arguments that proved to be unfounded again in the second instance. The judgment that rejects all the claims has now become final, with the claimants also being ordered to cover all legal costs of the proceedings. The end of the legal proceedings demonstrates that International Cable fully complied with all the responsibilities acquired in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement, always acting in accordance with the law.

Firmly believing that the claims had no legal grounds, Trilantic Europe relentlessly defended over the years the interests of its investors, refusing to settle at unfair terms and fighting until the end to prove that no money should leave the investors’ pockets. 

1 Jun 2017

toggle

Trilantic Europe invests in leading bioethanol business in Spain and France

The Provincial Court of Madrid, in response to the appeal filed by the selling shareholders of Euskaltel, ruled that the claims against International Cable (investment company of funds advised by Trilantic Europe and other co-investors) were based on an inadmissible interpretation of the earn-out clause in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement signed in 2012. Despite the judgment issued by the Court of First Instance having already dismissed their claims in their entirety, the claimants insisted on appealing the ruling, prolonging the litigation based on arguments that proved to be unfounded again in the second instance. The judgment that rejects all the claims has now become final, with the claimants also being ordered to cover all legal costs of the proceedings. The end of the legal proceedings demonstrates that International Cable fully complied with all the responsibilities acquired in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement, always acting in accordance with the law.

Firmly believing that the claims had no legal grounds, Trilantic Europe relentlessly defended over the years the interests of its investors, refusing to settle at unfair terms and fighting until the end to prove that no money should leave the investors’ pockets. 

7 Apr 2017

toggle

Trilantic Europe becomes a shareholder in Pacha Group

The Provincial Court of Madrid, in response to the appeal filed by the selling shareholders of Euskaltel, ruled that the claims against International Cable (investment company of funds advised by Trilantic Europe and other co-investors) were based on an inadmissible interpretation of the earn-out clause in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement signed in 2012. Despite the judgment issued by the Court of First Instance having already dismissed their claims in their entirety, the claimants insisted on appealing the ruling, prolonging the litigation based on arguments that proved to be unfounded again in the second instance. The judgment that rejects all the claims has now become final, with the claimants also being ordered to cover all legal costs of the proceedings. The end of the legal proceedings demonstrates that International Cable fully complied with all the responsibilities acquired in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement, always acting in accordance with the law.

Firmly believing that the claims had no legal grounds, Trilantic Europe relentlessly defended over the years the interests of its investors, refusing to settle at unfair terms and fighting until the end to prove that no money should leave the investors’ pockets. 

28 Nov 2016

toggle

Talgo wins the most important high-speed tender in Europe with its new Avril, the most advanced high-speed train

The Provincial Court of Madrid, in response to the appeal filed by the selling shareholders of Euskaltel, ruled that the claims against International Cable (investment company of funds advised by Trilantic Europe and other co-investors) were based on an inadmissible interpretation of the earn-out clause in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement signed in 2012. Despite the judgment issued by the Court of First Instance having already dismissed their claims in their entirety, the claimants insisted on appealing the ruling, prolonging the litigation based on arguments that proved to be unfounded again in the second instance. The judgment that rejects all the claims has now become final, with the claimants also being ordered to cover all legal costs of the proceedings. The end of the legal proceedings demonstrates that International Cable fully complied with all the responsibilities acquired in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement, always acting in accordance with the law.

Firmly believing that the claims had no legal grounds, Trilantic Europe relentlessly defended over the years the interests of its investors, refusing to settle at unfair terms and fighting until the end to prove that no money should leave the investors’ pockets. 

24 Feb 2016

toggle

Trilantic Europe Invests In Maugeri, Leading Italian Non-Acute Private Hospital Operator

The Provincial Court of Madrid, in response to the appeal filed by the selling shareholders of Euskaltel, ruled that the claims against International Cable (investment company of funds advised by Trilantic Europe and other co-investors) were based on an inadmissible interpretation of the earn-out clause in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement signed in 2012. Despite the judgment issued by the Court of First Instance having already dismissed their claims in their entirety, the claimants insisted on appealing the ruling, prolonging the litigation based on arguments that proved to be unfounded again in the second instance. The judgment that rejects all the claims has now become final, with the claimants also being ordered to cover all legal costs of the proceedings. The end of the legal proceedings demonstrates that International Cable fully complied with all the responsibilities acquired in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement, always acting in accordance with the law.

Firmly believing that the claims had no legal grounds, Trilantic Europe relentlessly defended over the years the interests of its investors, refusing to settle at unfair terms and fighting until the end to prove that no money should leave the investors’ pockets. 

13 Oct 2015

toggle

Trilantic Europe completes acquisition of 90% stake in leading Italian pharmaceuticals producer Doppel Farmaceutici

The Provincial Court of Madrid, in response to the appeal filed by the selling shareholders of Euskaltel, ruled that the claims against International Cable (investment company of funds advised by Trilantic Europe and other co-investors) were based on an inadmissible interpretation of the earn-out clause in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement signed in 2012. Despite the judgment issued by the Court of First Instance having already dismissed their claims in their entirety, the claimants insisted on appealing the ruling, prolonging the litigation based on arguments that proved to be unfounded again in the second instance. The judgment that rejects all the claims has now become final, with the claimants also being ordered to cover all legal costs of the proceedings. The end of the legal proceedings demonstrates that International Cable fully complied with all the responsibilities acquired in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement, always acting in accordance with the law.

Firmly believing that the claims had no legal grounds, Trilantic Europe relentlessly defended over the years the interests of its investors, refusing to settle at unfair terms and fighting until the end to prove that no money should leave the investors’ pockets. 

1 Jul 2015

toggle

IPO of Trilantic Europe IV’s portfolio companies, Talgo and Euskaltel

The Provincial Court of Madrid, in response to the appeal filed by the selling shareholders of Euskaltel, ruled that the claims against International Cable (investment company of funds advised by Trilantic Europe and other co-investors) were based on an inadmissible interpretation of the earn-out clause in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement signed in 2012. Despite the judgment issued by the Court of First Instance having already dismissed their claims in their entirety, the claimants insisted on appealing the ruling, prolonging the litigation based on arguments that proved to be unfounded again in the second instance. The judgment that rejects all the claims has now become final, with the claimants also being ordered to cover all legal costs of the proceedings. The end of the legal proceedings demonstrates that International Cable fully complied with all the responsibilities acquired in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement, always acting in accordance with the law.

Firmly believing that the claims had no legal grounds, Trilantic Europe relentlessly defended over the years the interests of its investors, refusing to settle at unfair terms and fighting until the end to prove that no money should leave the investors’ pockets. 

26 Mar 2015

toggle

Prettl and Trilantic Europe announce a partnership agreement

The Provincial Court of Madrid, in response to the appeal filed by the selling shareholders of Euskaltel, ruled that the claims against International Cable (investment company of funds advised by Trilantic Europe and other co-investors) were based on an inadmissible interpretation of the earn-out clause in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement signed in 2012. Despite the judgment issued by the Court of First Instance having already dismissed their claims in their entirety, the claimants insisted on appealing the ruling, prolonging the litigation based on arguments that proved to be unfounded again in the second instance. The judgment that rejects all the claims has now become final, with the claimants also being ordered to cover all legal costs of the proceedings. The end of the legal proceedings demonstrates that International Cable fully complied with all the responsibilities acquired in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement, always acting in accordance with the law.

Firmly believing that the claims had no legal grounds, Trilantic Europe relentlessly defended over the years the interests of its investors, refusing to settle at unfair terms and fighting until the end to prove that no money should leave the investors’ pockets. 

14 Jan 2015

toggle

Trilantic Capital Partners has realised its investment in Clarion Events

The Provincial Court of Madrid, in response to the appeal filed by the selling shareholders of Euskaltel, ruled that the claims against International Cable (investment company of funds advised by Trilantic Europe and other co-investors) were based on an inadmissible interpretation of the earn-out clause in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement signed in 2012. Despite the judgment issued by the Court of First Instance having already dismissed their claims in their entirety, the claimants insisted on appealing the ruling, prolonging the litigation based on arguments that proved to be unfounded again in the second instance. The judgment that rejects all the claims has now become final, with the claimants also being ordered to cover all legal costs of the proceedings. The end of the legal proceedings demonstrates that International Cable fully complied with all the responsibilities acquired in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement, always acting in accordance with the law.

Firmly believing that the claims had no legal grounds, Trilantic Europe relentlessly defended over the years the interests of its investors, refusing to settle at unfair terms and fighting until the end to prove that no money should leave the investors’ pockets. 

17 Oct 2013

toggle

Trilantic acquires stake in Elisabetta Franchi

The Provincial Court of Madrid, in response to the appeal filed by the selling shareholders of Euskaltel, ruled that the claims against International Cable (investment company of funds advised by Trilantic Europe and other co-investors) were based on an inadmissible interpretation of the earn-out clause in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement signed in 2012. Despite the judgment issued by the Court of First Instance having already dismissed their claims in their entirety, the claimants insisted on appealing the ruling, prolonging the litigation based on arguments that proved to be unfounded again in the second instance. The judgment that rejects all the claims has now become final, with the claimants also being ordered to cover all legal costs of the proceedings. The end of the legal proceedings demonstrates that International Cable fully complied with all the responsibilities acquired in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement, always acting in accordance with the law.

Firmly believing that the claims had no legal grounds, Trilantic Europe relentlessly defended over the years the interests of its investors, refusing to settle at unfair terms and fighting until the end to prove that no money should leave the investors’ pockets. 

16 Sep 2013

toggle

Gamenet successfully issues €200mn in its debut bond offering

The Provincial Court of Madrid, in response to the appeal filed by the selling shareholders of Euskaltel, ruled that the claims against International Cable (investment company of funds advised by Trilantic Europe and other co-investors) were based on an inadmissible interpretation of the earn-out clause in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement signed in 2012. Despite the judgment issued by the Court of First Instance having already dismissed their claims in their entirety, the claimants insisted on appealing the ruling, prolonging the litigation based on arguments that proved to be unfounded again in the second instance. The judgment that rejects all the claims has now become final, with the claimants also being ordered to cover all legal costs of the proceedings. The end of the legal proceedings demonstrates that International Cable fully complied with all the responsibilities acquired in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement, always acting in accordance with the law.

Firmly believing that the claims had no legal grounds, Trilantic Europe relentlessly defended over the years the interests of its investors, refusing to settle at unfair terms and fighting until the end to prove that no money should leave the investors’ pockets. 

26 Jun 2013

toggle

Spain's Talgo Awarded €482 million Contract In Kazakhstan

The Provincial Court of Madrid, in response to the appeal filed by the selling shareholders of Euskaltel, ruled that the claims against International Cable (investment company of funds advised by Trilantic Europe and other co-investors) were based on an inadmissible interpretation of the earn-out clause in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement signed in 2012. Despite the judgment issued by the Court of First Instance having already dismissed their claims in their entirety, the claimants insisted on appealing the ruling, prolonging the litigation based on arguments that proved to be unfounded again in the second instance. The judgment that rejects all the claims has now become final, with the claimants also being ordered to cover all legal costs of the proceedings. The end of the legal proceedings demonstrates that International Cable fully complied with all the responsibilities acquired in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement, always acting in accordance with the law.

Firmly believing that the claims had no legal grounds, Trilantic Europe relentlessly defended over the years the interests of its investors, refusing to settle at unfair terms and fighting until the end to prove that no money should leave the investors’ pockets. 

20 Nov 2012

toggle

Trilantic Europe exits Istanbul Doors Group, owner of the leading restaurants in Istanbul and Tom Aiken’s restaurants in London

The Provincial Court of Madrid, in response to the appeal filed by the selling shareholders of Euskaltel, ruled that the claims against International Cable (investment company of funds advised by Trilantic Europe and other co-investors) were based on an inadmissible interpretation of the earn-out clause in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement signed in 2012. Despite the judgment issued by the Court of First Instance having already dismissed their claims in their entirety, the claimants insisted on appealing the ruling, prolonging the litigation based on arguments that proved to be unfounded again in the second instance. The judgment that rejects all the claims has now become final, with the claimants also being ordered to cover all legal costs of the proceedings. The end of the legal proceedings demonstrates that International Cable fully complied with all the responsibilities acquired in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement, always acting in accordance with the law.

Firmly believing that the claims had no legal grounds, Trilantic Europe relentlessly defended over the years the interests of its investors, refusing to settle at unfair terms and fighting until the end to prove that no money should leave the investors’ pockets. 

14 May 2012

toggle

Marex Spectron to acquire Schneider Trading Associates Pro-Trader Division

The Provincial Court of Madrid, in response to the appeal filed by the selling shareholders of Euskaltel, ruled that the claims against International Cable (investment company of funds advised by Trilantic Europe and other co-investors) were based on an inadmissible interpretation of the earn-out clause in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement signed in 2012. Despite the judgment issued by the Court of First Instance having already dismissed their claims in their entirety, the claimants insisted on appealing the ruling, prolonging the litigation based on arguments that proved to be unfounded again in the second instance. The judgment that rejects all the claims has now become final, with the claimants also being ordered to cover all legal costs of the proceedings. The end of the legal proceedings demonstrates that International Cable fully complied with all the responsibilities acquired in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement, always acting in accordance with the law.

Firmly believing that the claims had no legal grounds, Trilantic Europe relentlessly defended over the years the interests of its investors, refusing to settle at unfair terms and fighting until the end to prove that no money should leave the investors’ pockets. 

12 Dec 2011

toggle

Talgo manufacturing facility opens in Kazakhstan

The Provincial Court of Madrid, in response to the appeal filed by the selling shareholders of Euskaltel, ruled that the claims against International Cable (investment company of funds advised by Trilantic Europe and other co-investors) were based on an inadmissible interpretation of the earn-out clause in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement signed in 2012. Despite the judgment issued by the Court of First Instance having already dismissed their claims in their entirety, the claimants insisted on appealing the ruling, prolonging the litigation based on arguments that proved to be unfounded again in the second instance. The judgment that rejects all the claims has now become final, with the claimants also being ordered to cover all legal costs of the proceedings. The end of the legal proceedings demonstrates that International Cable fully complied with all the responsibilities acquired in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement, always acting in accordance with the law.

Firmly believing that the claims had no legal grounds, Trilantic Europe relentlessly defended over the years the interests of its investors, refusing to settle at unfair terms and fighting until the end to prove that no money should leave the investors’ pockets. 

26 Oct 2011

toggle

Talgo awarded the High-Speed Mecca-Medina mega-contract

The Provincial Court of Madrid, in response to the appeal filed by the selling shareholders of Euskaltel, ruled that the claims against International Cable (investment company of funds advised by Trilantic Europe and other co-investors) were based on an inadmissible interpretation of the earn-out clause in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement signed in 2012. Despite the judgment issued by the Court of First Instance having already dismissed their claims in their entirety, the claimants insisted on appealing the ruling, prolonging the litigation based on arguments that proved to be unfounded again in the second instance. The judgment that rejects all the claims has now become final, with the claimants also being ordered to cover all legal costs of the proceedings. The end of the legal proceedings demonstrates that International Cable fully complied with all the responsibilities acquired in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement, always acting in accordance with the law.

Firmly believing that the claims had no legal grounds, Trilantic Europe relentlessly defended over the years the interests of its investors, refusing to settle at unfair terms and fighting until the end to prove that no money should leave the investors’ pockets. 

12 Apr 2011

toggle

Michel Léonard joins Trilantic Capital Partners as operating partner

The Provincial Court of Madrid, in response to the appeal filed by the selling shareholders of Euskaltel, ruled that the claims against International Cable (investment company of funds advised by Trilantic Europe and other co-investors) were based on an inadmissible interpretation of the earn-out clause in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement signed in 2012. Despite the judgment issued by the Court of First Instance having already dismissed their claims in their entirety, the claimants insisted on appealing the ruling, prolonging the litigation based on arguments that proved to be unfounded again in the second instance. The judgment that rejects all the claims has now become final, with the claimants also being ordered to cover all legal costs of the proceedings. The end of the legal proceedings demonstrates that International Cable fully complied with all the responsibilities acquired in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement, always acting in accordance with the law.

Firmly believing that the claims had no legal grounds, Trilantic Europe relentlessly defended over the years the interests of its investors, refusing to settle at unfair terms and fighting until the end to prove that no money should leave the investors’ pockets. 

24 Mar 2011

toggle

The Istanbul Doors Restaurant Group Acquires the Restaurant Business of Michelin-Starred Chef Tom Aikens

The Provincial Court of Madrid, in response to the appeal filed by the selling shareholders of Euskaltel, ruled that the claims against International Cable (investment company of funds advised by Trilantic Europe and other co-investors) were based on an inadmissible interpretation of the earn-out clause in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement signed in 2012. Despite the judgment issued by the Court of First Instance having already dismissed their claims in their entirety, the claimants insisted on appealing the ruling, prolonging the litigation based on arguments that proved to be unfounded again in the second instance. The judgment that rejects all the claims has now become final, with the claimants also being ordered to cover all legal costs of the proceedings. The end of the legal proceedings demonstrates that International Cable fully complied with all the responsibilities acquired in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement, always acting in accordance with the law.

Firmly believing that the claims had no legal grounds, Trilantic Europe relentlessly defended over the years the interests of its investors, refusing to settle at unfair terms and fighting until the end to prove that no money should leave the investors’ pockets. 

22 Mar 2011

toggle

Marex Group Reaches Agreement to Acquire Spectron Group

The Provincial Court of Madrid, in response to the appeal filed by the selling shareholders of Euskaltel, ruled that the claims against International Cable (investment company of funds advised by Trilantic Europe and other co-investors) were based on an inadmissible interpretation of the earn-out clause in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement signed in 2012. Despite the judgment issued by the Court of First Instance having already dismissed their claims in their entirety, the claimants insisted on appealing the ruling, prolonging the litigation based on arguments that proved to be unfounded again in the second instance. The judgment that rejects all the claims has now become final, with the claimants also being ordered to cover all legal costs of the proceedings. The end of the legal proceedings demonstrates that International Cable fully complied with all the responsibilities acquired in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement, always acting in accordance with the law.

Firmly believing that the claims had no legal grounds, Trilantic Europe relentlessly defended over the years the interests of its investors, refusing to settle at unfair terms and fighting until the end to prove that no money should leave the investors’ pockets. 

14 Feb 2011

toggle

Appointment of John Danilovich to Trilantic European Advisory Council

The Provincial Court of Madrid, in response to the appeal filed by the selling shareholders of Euskaltel, ruled that the claims against International Cable (investment company of funds advised by Trilantic Europe and other co-investors) were based on an inadmissible interpretation of the earn-out clause in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement signed in 2012. Despite the judgment issued by the Court of First Instance having already dismissed their claims in their entirety, the claimants insisted on appealing the ruling, prolonging the litigation based on arguments that proved to be unfounded again in the second instance. The judgment that rejects all the claims has now become final, with the claimants also being ordered to cover all legal costs of the proceedings. The end of the legal proceedings demonstrates that International Cable fully complied with all the responsibilities acquired in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement, always acting in accordance with the law.

Firmly believing that the claims had no legal grounds, Trilantic Europe relentlessly defended over the years the interests of its investors, refusing to settle at unfair terms and fighting until the end to prove that no money should leave the investors’ pockets. 

17 Jan 2011

toggle

Refresco Group Announces its Intention to Acquire Spumador

The Provincial Court of Madrid, in response to the appeal filed by the selling shareholders of Euskaltel, ruled that the claims against International Cable (investment company of funds advised by Trilantic Europe and other co-investors) were based on an inadmissible interpretation of the earn-out clause in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement signed in 2012. Despite the judgment issued by the Court of First Instance having already dismissed their claims in their entirety, the claimants insisted on appealing the ruling, prolonging the litigation based on arguments that proved to be unfounded again in the second instance. The judgment that rejects all the claims has now become final, with the claimants also being ordered to cover all legal costs of the proceedings. The end of the legal proceedings demonstrates that International Cable fully complied with all the responsibilities acquired in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement, always acting in accordance with the law.

Firmly believing that the claims had no legal grounds, Trilantic Europe relentlessly defended over the years the interests of its investors, refusing to settle at unfair terms and fighting until the end to prove that no money should leave the investors’ pockets. 

14 Jan 2011

toggle

Trilantic Capital Partners commits up to €50 million in LeYa

The Provincial Court of Madrid, in response to the appeal filed by the selling shareholders of Euskaltel, ruled that the claims against International Cable (investment company of funds advised by Trilantic Europe and other co-investors) were based on an inadmissible interpretation of the earn-out clause in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement signed in 2012. Despite the judgment issued by the Court of First Instance having already dismissed their claims in their entirety, the claimants insisted on appealing the ruling, prolonging the litigation based on arguments that proved to be unfounded again in the second instance. The judgment that rejects all the claims has now become final, with the claimants also being ordered to cover all legal costs of the proceedings. The end of the legal proceedings demonstrates that International Cable fully complied with all the responsibilities acquired in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement, always acting in accordance with the law.

Firmly believing that the claims had no legal grounds, Trilantic Europe relentlessly defended over the years the interests of its investors, refusing to settle at unfair terms and fighting until the end to prove that no money should leave the investors’ pockets. 

7 Jan 2011

toggle

Trilantic Capital Partners to Invest €53 million in Gamenet

The Provincial Court of Madrid, in response to the appeal filed by the selling shareholders of Euskaltel, ruled that the claims against International Cable (investment company of funds advised by Trilantic Europe and other co-investors) were based on an inadmissible interpretation of the earn-out clause in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement signed in 2012. Despite the judgment issued by the Court of First Instance having already dismissed their claims in their entirety, the claimants insisted on appealing the ruling, prolonging the litigation based on arguments that proved to be unfounded again in the second instance. The judgment that rejects all the claims has now become final, with the claimants also being ordered to cover all legal costs of the proceedings. The end of the legal proceedings demonstrates that International Cable fully complied with all the responsibilities acquired in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement, always acting in accordance with the law.

Firmly believing that the claims had no legal grounds, Trilantic Europe relentlessly defended over the years the interests of its investors, refusing to settle at unfair terms and fighting until the end to prove that no money should leave the investors’ pockets. 

11 Nov 2010

toggle

Talgo is awarded the contract to renew and expand the intercity passenger train coaches of the national railway company of Kazakhstan

The Provincial Court of Madrid, in response to the appeal filed by the selling shareholders of Euskaltel, ruled that the claims against International Cable (investment company of funds advised by Trilantic Europe and other co-investors) were based on an inadmissible interpretation of the earn-out clause in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement signed in 2012. Despite the judgment issued by the Court of First Instance having already dismissed their claims in their entirety, the claimants insisted on appealing the ruling, prolonging the litigation based on arguments that proved to be unfounded again in the second instance. The judgment that rejects all the claims has now become final, with the claimants also being ordered to cover all legal costs of the proceedings. The end of the legal proceedings demonstrates that International Cable fully complied with all the responsibilities acquired in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement, always acting in accordance with the law.

Firmly believing that the claims had no legal grounds, Trilantic Europe relentlessly defended over the years the interests of its investors, refusing to settle at unfair terms and fighting until the end to prove that no money should leave the investors’ pockets. 

28 Jul 2010

toggle

Thai Union Frozen Products Board of Directors Approves Acquisition of MW Brands from Trilantic Capital Partners

The Provincial Court of Madrid, in response to the appeal filed by the selling shareholders of Euskaltel, ruled that the claims against International Cable (investment company of funds advised by Trilantic Europe and other co-investors) were based on an inadmissible interpretation of the earn-out clause in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement signed in 2012. Despite the judgment issued by the Court of First Instance having already dismissed their claims in their entirety, the claimants insisted on appealing the ruling, prolonging the litigation based on arguments that proved to be unfounded again in the second instance. The judgment that rejects all the claims has now become final, with the claimants also being ordered to cover all legal costs of the proceedings. The end of the legal proceedings demonstrates that International Cable fully complied with all the responsibilities acquired in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement, always acting in accordance with the law.

Firmly believing that the claims had no legal grounds, Trilantic Europe relentlessly defended over the years the interests of its investors, refusing to settle at unfair terms and fighting until the end to prove that no money should leave the investors’ pockets. 

10 Feb 2010

toggle

Trilantic Capital Partners has Successfully Realized its Ownership Stake in Industria de Turbo Propulsores S.A.

The Provincial Court of Madrid, in response to the appeal filed by the selling shareholders of Euskaltel, ruled that the claims against International Cable (investment company of funds advised by Trilantic Europe and other co-investors) were based on an inadmissible interpretation of the earn-out clause in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement signed in 2012. Despite the judgment issued by the Court of First Instance having already dismissed their claims in their entirety, the claimants insisted on appealing the ruling, prolonging the litigation based on arguments that proved to be unfounded again in the second instance. The judgment that rejects all the claims has now become final, with the claimants also being ordered to cover all legal costs of the proceedings. The end of the legal proceedings demonstrates that International Cable fully complied with all the responsibilities acquired in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement, always acting in accordance with the law.

Firmly believing that the claims had no legal grounds, Trilantic Europe relentlessly defended over the years the interests of its investors, refusing to settle at unfair terms and fighting until the end to prove that no money should leave the investors’ pockets. 

24 Sep 2009

toggle

Talgo: Spanish Minister of Transportation to Support Talgo in its Internationalization

The Provincial Court of Madrid, in response to the appeal filed by the selling shareholders of Euskaltel, ruled that the claims against International Cable (investment company of funds advised by Trilantic Europe and other co-investors) were based on an inadmissible interpretation of the earn-out clause in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement signed in 2012. Despite the judgment issued by the Court of First Instance having already dismissed their claims in their entirety, the claimants insisted on appealing the ruling, prolonging the litigation based on arguments that proved to be unfounded again in the second instance. The judgment that rejects all the claims has now become final, with the claimants also being ordered to cover all legal costs of the proceedings. The end of the legal proceedings demonstrates that International Cable fully complied with all the responsibilities acquired in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement, always acting in accordance with the law.

Firmly believing that the claims had no legal grounds, Trilantic Europe relentlessly defended over the years the interests of its investors, refusing to settle at unfair terms and fighting until the end to prove that no money should leave the investors’ pockets. 

17 Jul 2009

toggle

Talgo: Governor Doyle Announces Agreement with Talgo to Bring New Trains, Assembly and Maintenance Facilities to Wisconsin

The Provincial Court of Madrid, in response to the appeal filed by the selling shareholders of Euskaltel, ruled that the claims against International Cable (investment company of funds advised by Trilantic Europe and other co-investors) were based on an inadmissible interpretation of the earn-out clause in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement signed in 2012. Despite the judgment issued by the Court of First Instance having already dismissed their claims in their entirety, the claimants insisted on appealing the ruling, prolonging the litigation based on arguments that proved to be unfounded again in the second instance. The judgment that rejects all the claims has now become final, with the claimants also being ordered to cover all legal costs of the proceedings. The end of the legal proceedings demonstrates that International Cable fully complied with all the responsibilities acquired in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement, always acting in accordance with the law.

Firmly believing that the claims had no legal grounds, Trilantic Europe relentlessly defended over the years the interests of its investors, refusing to settle at unfair terms and fighting until the end to prove that no money should leave the investors’ pockets. 

9 Apr 2009

toggle

Istanbul Doors: Group Launches New Italian Restaurant Concepts

The Provincial Court of Madrid, in response to the appeal filed by the selling shareholders of Euskaltel, ruled that the claims against International Cable (investment company of funds advised by Trilantic Europe and other co-investors) were based on an inadmissible interpretation of the earn-out clause in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement signed in 2012. Despite the judgment issued by the Court of First Instance having already dismissed their claims in their entirety, the claimants insisted on appealing the ruling, prolonging the litigation based on arguments that proved to be unfounded again in the second instance. The judgment that rejects all the claims has now become final, with the claimants also being ordered to cover all legal costs of the proceedings. The end of the legal proceedings demonstrates that International Cable fully complied with all the responsibilities acquired in the Euskaltel sale and purchase agreement, always acting in accordance with the law.

Firmly believing that the claims had no legal grounds, Trilantic Europe relentlessly defended over the years the interests of its investors, refusing to settle at unfair terms and fighting until the end to prove that no money should leave the investors’ pockets. 

Contact

Trilantic Europe

Luxembourg

Trilantic Europe Sarl
26 Boulevard Royal
L-2449 Luxembourg

United Kingdom

Trilantic Capital Partners LLP
35 Portman Square
London, W1H 6LR, UK

Italy

Trilantic Europe Srl
Via Turati 3
Milano 20121, Italy

Spain

Trilantic Europe SL
Claudio Coello 33
Madrid 28001, Spain

Germany

Trilantic Europe GmbH
Kleine Johannisstraße 10
Hamburg 20457, Germany